M/S. AKSHAYAKALPA FARMS AND FOODS PVT LTD,TUMKUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1, TUMKUR

PDF · subscribers
ITA 26/BANG/2019Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore17 September 2019AY 2015-164 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal, noting the assessee's non-appearance before both the AO and CIT(A), decided to restore the issue to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication in the interest of natural justice. This restoration is conditional upon the assessee paying a cost of Rs. 5000.

What were the facts?

The assessee's appeal concerns the valuation of shares on conversion of preference shares into equity shares. The Assessing Officer (AO) determined the fair market value (FMV) of equity shares at a lower rate than the conversion price, leading to an addition of Rs. 50.79 lakhs under Section 56(2)(viib). The CIT(A) confirmed this addition.

What were the issues?

The primary issue is the correct valuation of equity shares upon conversion of compulsory convertible preference shares. The secondary issue is whether the assessee should be granted another opportunity to present its case before the lower appellate authority.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 56(2)(viib)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B’’ BENCH : BANGALORE

Before: SHRI B.R BASKARAN & SMT. BEENA PILLAI

For Respondent: Shri Vinod Sharma, JCIT (DR)
Hearing: 17.09.2019Pronounced: 17.09.2019

O R D E R Per B.R. Baskaran, Accountant Member

The assessee has filed this appeal challenging the order dated 6/11/2018 passed by ld CIT(A)-7, Bengaluru and it relates to asst. year 2015-16.

2.

None appeared on behalf of the assessee. Even though the notice of hearing was sent by registered post on the prior occasion and it was duly acknowledged by the assessee, yet the assessee did not appear for the hearing. Hence we proceed to dispose of the appeal ex-parte, without the presence of the assessee.

3.

We heard ld DR and perused the record. We noticed that the assessee has not appeared before ld CIT(A) also and hence the first appellate authority was constrained to pass order ex-parte.

4.

The issue contested by the assessee was related to valuation of shares on conversion of compulsory convertible preference shares (CCPS) into equity shares. The assessee had converted CCPS into equity shares of Rs.10 each at price of 17.52. However, the AO determined the FMV of equity shares at 12.80 per share. Accordingly the AO has assessed excess amount aggregating to Rs.50.79 lakhs as income of the assessee u/s 56(2)(viib) of the Act. The ld CIT(A) confirmed the addition and hence the assessee has filed this appeal before the Tribunal.

5.

We have already noticed that the assessee has not appeared before the ld CIT(A) and hence the Ld CIT(A) has passed order ex- parte. However, in the interest of natural justice, we are of the view that the assessee should be provided with one more opportunity to present its case before ld CIT(A). However, the same will be at cost. Accordingly we impose a cost of Rs.5000/- (Rupees Five thousand) upon the assessee which shall be paid to the credit of Income-tax Department as ‘other fees’ within a period of 2 months from the receipt of this order. Subject to the payment of above fees, all the issues contested in the present appeal are restored to the file of ld CIT(A) for adjudicating them afresh, after affording adequate opportunity of being heard to the assessee.

6.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes.

Order pronounced in the Open Court on 17th September, 2019.

More judgments on Section 56(2)(viib)

All 746 judgments and leading authorities on Section 56(2)(viib) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →