DASHMESH EDUCATIONAL CHARITABLE TRUST,DELHI vs. DCIT(E),CIRCLE 1(1), NEW DELHI, NEW DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee had raised legal grounds which could have been adjudicated independently of their appearance. Therefore, the Tribunal decided to set aside the impugned order.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal was dismissed by the First Appellate Authority due to non-appearance. The assessee claimed that notices were not received, although the authority stated they were sent to the registered email ID.
What were the issues?
Whether the dismissal of appeal for non-appearance by the First Appellate Authority was justified when legal grounds were raised.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH, DELHI
Before: SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA & SHRI MANISH AGARWAL
This appeal is preferred by the assessee against the order dated 13.06.2025 of the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (NFAC)
P a g e | Dashmesh Educational Charitable Trust (AY: 2015-16) (hereinafter referred as Ld. First Appellate Authority or in short Ld. ‘FAA’) in DIN & Order No: ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025-26/1076998296(1) arising out of the order dated 30.05.2023 u/s 147 r.w.s. 144 r.w.s. 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) passed by the Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department for AY: 2015-16.
At the time of hearing, it came up that the appeal was dismissed by the Ld. First Appellate Authority, primarily for the reason of non-appearance of the assessee, and as assessee was unable to file any submissions in support of the grounds raised.
Ld. Counsel has submitted that notices were not received, while in Para 3.1 of the impugned order we find, it is mentioned that notices were sent on registered email ID. However, what is relevant is that assessee had raised legal grounds also, which could have been determined independently of the assessee putting in appearance.
In the light of the aforesaid facts, we are inclined to set aside the impugned order of Ld. First Appellate Authority and allow the appeal of the P a g e | Dashmesh Educational Charitable Trust (AY: 2015-16) assessee for the statistical purposes. The Ld. CIT(A) is directed to give fresh opportunity to the assessee and to pass the order afresh.
Order pronounced in the open court on 23.01.2026
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Surya Prakash Aroma vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 OthersAllahabad · 27 Oct 2026
- Mrs. Aqsa Begum vs. Union Of INDIATelangana · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Govindjee Dairy Milk Private Limited vs. Central Goods And Services TaxRajasthan · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S. V J Petro Products vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St) - IiiAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Asian Aura vs. Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026