DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. CBRE (PTE) LTD., SINGAPORE
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal. This was based on a CBDT circular revising the monetary limit for filing appeals to the ITAT to Rs. 20 lakhs, and the tax involved in this appeal was less than that limit.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against the CIT(A)'s order that referral fees received by the assessee were commission and not royalty/FTS. The Assessing Officer had treated these fees as royalty income and taxed them accordingly.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the referral fees constituted royalty or FTS. However, the appeal was dismissed on procedural grounds due to the monetary limit for appeals.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Not Applicable
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘B’,
Before: SHRI N. K. BILLAIYA, & MS. SUCHITRA KAMBLE
PER N. K. BILLAIYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
This appeal by the Revenue is preferred against the order of the ld. CIT(A) – 42, New Delhi dated 15.01.2015 pertaining to A.Y 2010-11.
The sole grievance of the Revenue is that the CIT(A) erred in holding that :
“the referral fees received from CBRE India was in the nature of commission, as the case of the assessee falls under Article 12(4)(a) of DTAA and the consideration received was for rendering of referral services which were ancillary and subsidiary to the enjoyments of confidential commercial information as such in the nature of Royalty/FTS.”
The Assessing Officer computed the taxable income and the Income tax as under:
Returned income : Nil Add : Royalty income termed as referral Fees by the assessee as discussed Above. : Rs. 1,08,13,630/- Total taxable income : Rs. 1,08,13,630/- Tax on above 15% of gross basis : Rs. 16,22,045/-
A perusal of the above shows that the total tax involved in the present appeal is Rs. 16.22 lakhs, which is less than Rs. 20 lakhs. This appeal by the Revenue has to be dismissed in the light of the CBDT Circular No. 3/2018 dated 11.07.2018 by which the Board has revised the monetary limit for filing of appeals by the department before the ITAT and the monetary limit has been fixed at Rs. 20 lakhs. The Board at Clause 13 of the said Circular has clarified as under:
“This Circular will apply to SLPs/appeals/cross objections/references to be filed henceforth in Supreme Court/High Court/Tribunal and it shall also apply retrospectively to pending SLPs/appeals/cross objections/ references. The pending appeals below the specified tax limit in para 3 above may be withdrawn/not pressed.”
4. In the light of the aforesaid CBDT Circular, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed.
In the result, the appeal of the revenue in is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 28.02.2019.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Mascot Constructions Co. And Another vs. The Commissioner Of Goods And Services Tax (GST) And AnotherBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Fasil Hussain Shah vs. Ut Of J And K Th Commissioner Secretary TO Government Finance Department And OthersJammu and Kashmir and Ladakh · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S. Devkinandan Traders vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Dixit Medical Agencies vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026