INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-3(4), HUBLI vs. BSNL EMPLOYEES O-OP CREDIT SOCIETY LTD, HUBLI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the tax effect in the appeal was below Rs. 50 Lakhs. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed as not maintainable due to low tax effect.
What were the facts?
The revenue filed an appeal against the CIT(A)'s order allowing deduction under Section 80P. The assessee argued that the appeal was not maintainable due to low tax effect as per CBDT instructions.
What were the issues?
Whether the revenue's appeal is maintainable given the low tax effect as per CBDT instructions.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH : BANGALORE
Before: SHRI ARUN KUMAR GARODIA & SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE
O R D E R
Per Shri A.K. Garodia, Accountant Member
This appeal is filed by the revenue which is directed against the order of ld. CIT(A) -Hubli dated 28.02.2017 for Assessment Year 2014-15.
The grounds raised by the revenue are as under. Tax effect relating Grounds of Appeal to each Ground of appeal Deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) allowed by CIT(A) though the 1. case comes under the purview of Rs. 7,19,660/- section 2(24) (viia) and section 80P (4) wef 01/04/2007 Total tax effect (see note below) Rs. 7,19,660/-
At the very outset, it was submitted by ld. AR of assessee that in the present case, the tax effect is below Rs. 50 Lakhs and therefore, the appeal of the Page 2 of 2 revenue is not maintainable because of low tax effect as per the recent CBDT instructions. He further pointed out that the return of income as per the assessment order is Nil after claiming deduction u/s. 80P of the IT Act of Rs. 23,39,144/- and the AO has assessed the income at Rs. 24,11,516/- and therefore, the tax effect in the appeal of the revenue is below Rs. 50 Lakhs. In reply, the ld. DR of revenue had nothing to say.
We have considered the rival submissions. We find that definitely, the tax effect in the present case is below Rs. 50 Lakhs. In fact, in the grounds of appeal itself, the tax effect is worked out at Rs. 79,660/-. Hence, the appeal of the revenue is not maintainable as per the recent CBDT instructions because of low tax effect. Therefore, we dismiss this appeal of the revenue because of low tax effect.
In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed. Order pronounced in the open court on the date mentioned on the caption page.
More judgments on Section 80P
- Shree Bandharda Seva Sahkari Mandli Ltd… vs Income Tax Officer Ward -4, JunagadhITA 881/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Duddukuru Primary Agricultural Cooperative… vs ITO, Ward - 1, TadepalligudemITA 258/VIZ/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Parthasaradhi Mutually Aided Co-Operative… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-17(1), HyderabadITA 2322/HYD/2026[AY 2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026
- Jijamata Mahila Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahakari… vs ITO Ward -1, BhandraITA 102/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Shri Na vs Ari Khedut Sahkari Society Ltd…ITA 362/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Sita Enterprises vs. Office Of The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Sri Tatiparthy Venkata Swamy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 25 Oct 2026
- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026