Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH : SMC : NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI R.K. PANDA
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH : SMC : NEW DELHI
BEFORE SHRI R.K. PANDA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No.2588/Del/2018 Assessment Year: 2014-15 Rajbir Singh, Vs. ITO, VPO-Machhgarh, Ward-11(2), Ballabgarh, Faridabad. Faridabad. PAN: CSLPS0214B (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : None Revenue by : Shri Amit Jain, Sr.DR Date of Hearing : 11.03.2019 Date of Pronouncement : 11.03.2019 ORDER
This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order dated 18th December, 2017 of the CIT(A), Faridabad, relating to Assessment Year 2014-15.
This case was fixed for hearing by issue of notice through RPAD. However, the notice was returned unserved by the Postal Authorities with the remark ‘no such person.’ The assessee has also not taken any steps to intimate the changed address, if any. This shows that the assessee is not interested in prosecuting the appeal field by him. Therefore, following the decisions mentioned below, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed for want of prosecution:-
ITA No.2588/Del/2018
CIT vs. B.N. Bhattachargee & Anr., 118 ITR 461. 2. Estate of late Tukojirao Holkar vs. CWT, 223 ITR 480 (M.P.). 3. Commissioner of Income-tax vs. Multiplan India (P.) Ltd, 38 ITD 320 (Del.).
However, if the assessee, through proper application, explains the reasons for such non-appearance, the Tribunal may, at its discretion, recall this order. 4. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed in limine for want of prosecution. The decision was pronounced in the open court at the time of hearing itself on 11.03.2019. Sd/- (R.K. PANDA) ACCOUNTANT MEMFBER Dated: 11th March, 2019 dk Copy forwarded to 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR Asstt. Registrar, ITAT, New Delhi