Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Detected automatically from the text. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH : SMC : NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI R.K. PANDA
BEFORE SHRI R.K. PANDA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year: 2014-15 Rajbir Singh, Vs. ITO, VPO-Machhgarh, Ward-11(2), Ballabgarh, Faridabad. Faridabad. PAN: CSLPS0214B (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : None Revenue by : Shri Amit Jain, Sr.DR Date of Hearing : 11.03.2019 Date of Pronouncement : 11.03.2019 ORDER
This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order dated 18th December, 2017 of the CIT(A), Faridabad, relating to Assessment Year 2014-15.
This case was fixed for hearing by issue of notice through RPAD. However, the notice was returned unserved by the Postal Authorities with the remark ‘no such person.’ The assessee has also not taken any steps to intimate the changed address, if any. This shows that the assessee is not interested in prosecuting the appeal field by him. Therefore, following the decisions mentioned below, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed for want of prosecution:-
CIT vs. B.N. Bhattachargee & Anr., 118 ITR 461.
2. Estate of late Tukojirao Holkar vs. CWT, 223 ITR 480 (M.P.). 3. Commissioner of Income-tax vs. Multiplan India (P.) Ltd, 38 ITD 320 (Del.).