GANM INDIA IMPEX,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, WARD- 30(4), NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that while the CIT(A) does not have the power to remand, the Tribunal itself does. Therefore, the issue of TDS credit was restored to the Assessing Officer for verification and a speaking order.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed TDS credit of Rs. 3,95,971 in their return. The Assessing Officer allowed only Rs. 1,54,303, later revised to Rs. 1,85,928 after a rectification application. The CIT(A) then remitted the matter back to the Assessing Officer.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) has the power to remand the matter back to the Assessing Officer for verification of TDS credit, and if not, what is the appropriate course of action.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH : SMC : NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI R.K. PANDA
BEFORE SHRI R.K. PANDA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year: 2012-13 GANM India Impex, Vs. ITO, 203, 2nd Floor, Skylark Building, Ward-30(4), 60, Nehru Place, New Delhi. New Delhi. PAN: AAJFG3731F (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri Anuj Jain, CA Revenue by : Shri Amit Jain, Sr.DR Date of Hearing : 12.03.2019 Date of Pronouncement : .03.2019 ORDER
This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order dated 30th May, 2018 of the CIT(A)-10, New Delhi, relating to Assessment Year 2012-13.
Although a number of grounds have been raised by the assessee, they all relate to the order of the CIT(A) in remitting the matter back to the Assessing Officer instead of deciding the same regarding TDS credit.
After hearing both the sides I find the assessment in this case was completed u/s 143(3) at an income of Rs.16,46,850/- as against the returned income of Rs.14,89,600/-. The assessee had claimed TDS of Rs.3,95,971/- in the return of income. However, the Assessing Officer allowed credit of TDS amounting to Rs.1,54,303/- only. Against the short credit of TDS allowed by the Assessing Officer, the assessee filed an application u/s 154 of the Act seeking full credit of TDS claimed in the return of income. The Assessing Officer, vide order passed u/s 154 on 10.11.2016 gave credit towards TDS and TCS to the extent of Rs.1,85,928/-. The assessee preferred an appeal before the CIT(A) and the ld.CIT(A), vide his order dated 30th May, 2018, restored the issue to the file of Assessing Officer with a direction to examine the claim of the assessee in respect of credit of TDS and pass a speaking order after providing opportunity of being heard to the assessee.
Aggrieved with such order of the CIT(A), the assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal.
I have considered the rival arguments made by both the sides and perused the orders of the authorities below. The ld.CIT(A) has no power to remand the matter back to the file of Assessing Officer. However, the Tribunal has got such power to remand the matter back to the file of the Assessing Officer for verification of the TDS claim by the assessee. I, therefore, deem it proper to restore the issue to the file of the Assessing Officer with a direction to verify the credit of TDS claim made by the assessee and give necessary credit for the same after giving due opportunity of being heard to the assessee. I hold and direct accordingly. The grounds raised by the assessee are accordingly, allowed for statistical purposes.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. The decision was pronounced in the open court on 13.03.2019.
More judgments on Section 154
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Rakesh Kumar Malani, JaipurITA 1425/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Anita Sharma, JaipurITA 1344/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Ramtirath Bawa, Nagpur vs ITO Ward3(4), NagpurITA 327/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Mohinder Singh, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 3(4), NagpurITA 322/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Ramakrishna Reddy Makireddy, Hyderabad vs ACIT, Circle-5(1), HyderabadITA 70/HYD/2026[2007-08]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2007-08
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Sri Tatiparthy Venkata Swamy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 25 Oct 2026
- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026
- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026