ITO NON CORPORATE WARD 1(2), CHENNAI vs. DR. R.GUNASEELAN, CHENNAI

आदेश / O R D E R

PER BENCH

These appeals are filed by the Revenue against the consolidated order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)- 2, Chennai in appeal Nos.81,70,82 & 231/2016-17, dated 31.12.2018, for the assessment years 2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14

ITA Nos.799 to 802/Chny/2019 :- 2 -: Dr.R.Gunaseelan

& 2014-15 and most importantly, the tax effect involved in all

these four appeals does not exceed Rs.50,00,000/-.

Mr.B.Ramakrishnan, represented on behalf of the assessee.

further liberalized its policy for not filing appeals against the

decisions of the appellate authorities in favour of the taxpayers,

wherein tax involved is below certain threshold limits, and

announced its policy decision not to file, or press, the appeals,

before this Tribunal, against the appellate orders favourable to the

assessee in the cases in which overall tax effect, excluding interest

except when interest itself is in dispute, is Rs 50,00,000 or less.

3.1 In view of the above factual background and the concession

by this CBDT circular, all these four appeals must be dismissed as

withdrawn.

further relaxation. The old circular, beyond any dispute or

controversy, categorically applied to the pending appeals as on the

date of issuance of circular. The circular dated 8th August 2019 is not a standalone 5.

circular. It is to be read in conjunction with the CBDT circular No.

3/2018 (and subsequent amendment thereto), and all it does is to

replace paragraph nos. 3 and 5 of the said circular. This is evident

ITA Nos.799 to 802/Chny/2019 :- 3 -: Dr.R.Gunaseelan

from the following extracts from the circular dated 8th August

2019:

“2. As a step towards further management of litigation, it has been decided by the Board that monetary limits for filing of appeals in income- tax cases be enhanced further through amendment in Para 3 of the Circular mentioned above and accordingly, the table for monetary limits specified in Para 3 of the Circular shall read as follows:

S.No. Appeals/SLPs in Income-tax matters Monetary Limit (₹.) 1 Before Appellate Tribunal 50,00,000 2 Before High Court 1,00,00,000 3 Before Supreme Court 2,00,00,000

“5. The Assessing Officer shall calculate the tax effect separately for every assessment year in respect of the disputed issues in the case of everyassessee. If in the case of an assessee, the disputed issues arise in more than one assessment year, appeal can be filed in respect of such assessment year or years in which the tax effect in respect of the disputed issues exceeds the monetary limit specified in para 3. No appeal shall be filed in respect of an assessment year or years in which the tax effect is less than the monetary limit specified in para-3. Further, even in the case of composite order of any High Court or appellate authority which involves more than one assessment year and common issues in more than one assessment year no appeal shall be filed in respect of an assessment year or years in which the tax effect is less than the monetary limit specified in para 3. In case where a composite order/ judgement involves more than one assessee, each assessee shall be dealt with separately”

(supra) have remained intact. The portion which has remained

intact includes paragraph 13 of the aforesaid circular which is as

follows:

“13. This Circular will apply to SLPs/ appeals/ cross objections/ references to be filed henceforth in SC/HCs/Tribunal and it shall also apply retrospectively to pending SLPs/ appeals/ cross

ITA Nos.799 to 802/Chny/2019 :- 4 -: Dr.R.Gunaseelan

objections/references. Pending appeals below the specified tax limits in pare 3 above may be withdrawn/ not pressed.”

of Income Tax-5, New Delhi Vs. Keshav Power Ltd., in SLP

No.21497/2019 dated 16.08.2019 reported in 2019(8)TMI 811(SC)

has also applied the Circular No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 has

dismissed the appeal holding as follows:

“Since the tax effect involved in the matter is less than Rs.2/- crores, going by the latest circular issued by the CBDT, we see no reason to interfere in this matter. The Special Leave Petition is dismissed, leaving all the questions of law open”.

given to point out, upon necessary further verifications, and to

seek recall the dismissal of appeals and restoration of the appeals

in the cases (i) in which it can be demonstrated that the appeals

are covered by the exceptions, and (ii) which are inadvertently

included in this bunch of appeals, wherein the tax effect, in terms of the CBDT circular (supra), exceeds ₹. 50,00,000. None opposes

this prayer; we accept the same. We make it clear that the

appellants shall be at liberty to point out the cases which are

wrongly included in the appeals so summarily dismissed by filing

he necessary application either owing to wrong computation of tax

effect or owning to such cases being covered by the permissible

exceptions.

ITA Nos.799 to 802/Chny/2019 :- 5 -: Dr.R.Gunaseelan

laid down by the Hon”ble Supreme Court in the case of

Commissioner of Income Tax-5,New Delhi Vs. Keshav Power Ltd.,

referred to supra and in the light of the above discussions, all the

four appeals filed by the Revenue are found to be non-maintainable.

the assessment years 2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14 & 2014-15 are

dismissed.

Order pronounced in the open court after conclusion of hearing on 13th May, 2020, at Chennai.

Sd/- Sd/- (एस जयरामन) ( जॉज� माथन) (S. JAYARAMAN) (GEORGE MATHAN) लेखा सद�य/Accountant Member �या�यक सद�य/JUDICIAL MEMBER चे�नई/Chennai �दनांक/Dated: 13th May, 2020. K S Sundaram आदेश क� ��त�ल�प अ�े�षत/Copy to: 1. अपीलाथ�/Appellant 3. आयकर आयु�त (अपील)/CIT(A) 5. �वभागीय ��त�न�ध/DR 2. ��यथ�/Respondent 4. आयकर आयु�त/CIT 6. गाड� फाईल/GF