ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-4(1)(2), BENGALURU vs. M/S. MHM HOLDINGS PVT LTD, BENGALURU
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The ITAT held that the appeal filed by the Revenue was not maintainable due to low tax effect. This was based on a CBDT notification that mandates no appeal to be filed if the tax effect is below Rs. 50.00 Lakhs, which was applicable to pending appeals.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) against an order of the CIT(A). The appeal concerned the assessment year 2010-11.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the maintainability of the Revenue's appeal before the ITAT due to a low tax effect as per CBDT instructions.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, BANGALORE BENCHES : “B”, BANGALORE
Before: SHRI B.R.BASKARAN & SHRI BEENA PILLAI, JUDICAL MEMBER
PER SMT. BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER
This appeal has been filed by Revenue against order of Ld.CIT(A)-4, Bangalore dated 27.10.2017 for Assessment Year 2010-11.
We have considered rival submissions by both sides.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Rohit Medical Systems vs. Commissioner Of Delhi Goods And Services Tax And Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Shivam Kumar vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Rajkalpana Travels PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner CGST, Delhi North CommissionerateDelhi · 28 Oct 2026