Facts
The assessee company declared a total income of Rs.90,780/- in its return. The case was selected for limited scrutiny concerning investment and verification of funds received as share premium. The Assessing Officer (AO) made an addition of Rs.14,25,48,000/- under Section 56(viib) of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(A) had allowed the assessee's appeal against this addition.
Held
The Tribunal found that the assessee received significant share premium and capital. Despite the AO summoning the parties involved, they failed to appear, and the assessee could not substantiate its case. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)'s order and upheld the AO's addition.
Key Issues
Whether the CIT(A) erred in deleting the addition made under Section 56(2) of the Act concerning share allotment in excess of fair market value.
Sections Cited
56(viib), 250(6), 143(3), 143(2), 142(1), Rule 11UA(2)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: “F” NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI S RIFAUR RAHMAN & SHRI VIMAL KUMAR
PER VIMAL KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
The appeal filed by the Department of Revenue is against order dated 08.11.2019 of Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-7, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as “Ld. CIT(A)") under Section 250(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act”) arising out of assessment order dated 28.12.2018 of the Learned Assessing Officer/Income Tax Officer, Ward 20(3), New Delhi ((hereinafter referred to as "Ld. AO") under Section 143 (3) of the Act for AY 2016-17.
Brief facts of the case are that assessee company filed its return of income on 17.10.2016 declaring total income of Rs.90,780/-. The case was selected for under limited scrutiny through CASS for verification of investment and also for verification of funds received in the form of share premium are from disclosed sources and have correctly been offered for tax. Notice under Section 143(2) of the Act was issued electronically on 05.07.2017. Notice under Section 142(1) of the Act were issued. Assessee filed electronically responses to the notices. On completion of proceedings, Ld. AO vide order dated 28.12.2018, assessed income of Rs.14,26,38,780/- and made addition of Rs.14,25,48,000/- under Section 56(viib) of the Act.
Against order dated 28.12.2018 of Ld. AO, the assessee filed appeal before Ld. CIT(A) which was allowed vide order dated 08.11.2019.
Being aggrieved, the Appellant/Department of Revenue, preferred present appeal with following grounds: “1. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in deleting the addition u/s 56(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 of Rs.14,25,48,000/- on account of share allotment in excess of fair market value as determined under Rule 11UA(2) of the Income Tax Rules, 1962.”
5. Learned Departmental Representative submitted that Ld. CIT(A) erred in deleting addition of Rs.14,25,48,000/- under Section under Section 56(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 of Rs.14,25,48,000/- on account of share allotment in excess of fair market value as determined under Rule 11UA(2) of the Income Tax Rules, 1962. Ld. AO for valid reasons had made the addition.
None appeared on behalf of assessee on 14.07.2022, 06.10.2022, 13.12.2022, 06.03.2023 , 18.07.2023, 03.10.2023, 14.12.2023, 07.03.2024, 20.05.2024, 20.09.2024 and 24.12.2024. Notices sent to the assessee were returned unserved.
From examination of record in light of aforesaid rival contentions, it is crystal clear that the assessee company received shares premium of Rs.14,28,00,000/- and share capital of Rs.12,00,000/-. Copies of agreement were filed by the assessee. Ld. AO summoned the parties but they failed to appear. On basis of irregularities found, DCF method submitted by the Department, assessee remained unsubstantiated and was rejected. Fair market value of the shares was assessed and addition of Rs.14,26,48,000/- was made. Therefore, order of Ld. CIT(A) being not just, fair, reasonable and legal is set aside. Accordingly, ground of appeal
is accepted.
8. In the result, the appeal filed by the Department of Revenue is allowed. Order pronounced in the open court on 20th January, 2026. Sd/- Sd/- (S RIFAUR RAHMAN) (VIMAL KUMAR) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Dated: 27th January, 2026. Mohan Lal