FIS GLOBAL BUSINESS SOLUTIONS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,DELHI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee had initially filed the original return claiming part relief and that a revised claim would not attract Section 80A(5) if the original return was filed within the due date. The Tribunal accepted the assessee's ground in principle, considering the insertion of a new proviso to Section 80JJA.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the order denying deduction under Section 80JJAA for AY 2018-19. The assessee had initially claimed a deduction of Rs. 58,12,704 in the original ITR but later filed a revised claim for Rs. 3,07,55,995, supported by a revised Form 10DA.
What were the issues?
Whether a revised claim for deduction under Section 80JJAA is admissible if the original return was filed within the due date, even if a part of the deduction was claimed in the original return?
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(6)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- EBR Enterprises v. Union of India69 citing107 Taxmann.com 220 · 2019 · HC
- Chirakkal Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd. Kannur v. CIT62 citing68 Taxmann.com 298 · 2016 · HC
- 36 Taxmann.com 523 3. Plastiblends India Ltd. v. Addl.CIT23 citing138 Taxmann.com 416 · 2022 · HC
- CIT v. Texas Instruments (India) P. Ltd.19 citing127 Taxmann.com 59 · 2021 · HC
- Shree Datta Prasad Sahakari Patsanstha Ltd. v. ITO10 citing134 Taxmann.com 324 · 2022
- Income Tax Officer v. Jagtap Patil Promoters\nand Builders7 citing147 Taxmann.com 199 · 2023
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘E’, NEW DELHI
Before: Sh. Satbeer Singh Godara & Sh. Manish Agarwal
Per Satbeer Singh Godara, Judicial Member:
This assessee’s appeal for Assessment Year 2018-19 arises against the CIT(A)/NFAC, Delhi’s DIN & order No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024–25/1074701797(1) dated 19.03.2025, in proceedings u/s 14(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “the Act”).
Heard both the parties at length. Case file perused.
We notice at the outset that the assessee/appellant is aggrieved against both the learned lower authorities’ action denying section 80JJA deduction herein in assessment order FIS Global Business Solutions India Pvt. Ltd. FIS Global Business Solutions India Pvt. Ltd. dated 08.04.
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 80JJAA
- Vaishnavi Enterprises, Pune vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 8…ITA 3464/PUN/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Schwarz Sperren Intelligence and Security… vs Income Tax Officer, Kautilya BhavanITA 7072/MUM/2026[2020-2021]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2020-2021
- Neptune Holidays Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 8(2), KolkataITA 1958/KOL/2026[2023-2024]Status: Disposed24 Sept 2026AY 2023-2024
- Neptune Holidays Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 8(2), KolkataITA 1957/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed24 Sept 2026AY 2015-2016
- 3 Generations, Delhi vs DCIT, Circle-49(1), DelhiITA 2741/DEL/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed24 Sept 2026AY 2024-25
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Dc Security Services vs. Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreekanth Enterprises vs. Joint Commissioner AppealsUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- Sharad Ashok Agarwal vs. State Of Maharashtra Through G.P. And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026