MOUNTAIN MEDICINE SOCIETY,NEW DELHI vs. CIT ( EXEMPTION), NEW DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 2548/DEL/2025Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 January 2026AY 2024-25Bench: SHRI C.N. PRASAD (Judicial Member), SHRI M. BALAGANESH (Accountant Member)1 pages

In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal acknowledged that the assessee had furnished partial details and faced difficulties in providing complete information. The Tribunal decided to provide one more opportunity to the assessee to comply with the CIT(E)'s directions.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(E) rejecting their application for registration under Section 12AB of the Income Tax Act. The rejection was based on the assessee's alleged non-compliance with notices for details.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(E) was justified in rejecting the registration application under Section 12AB for non-compliance, and whether the assessee should be given another opportunity to provide the required details.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 12AB,Section 12A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH, ‘B’: NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI C.N. PRASAD & SHRI M. BALAGANESH

Hearing: 02.12.2025Pronounced: 28.01.2026

Date of Hearing 02.12.2025 Date of Pronouncement 28.01.2026 ORDER

PER C.N. PRASAD, JM,

1.

This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of the Ld.Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions)/ NFAC, Delhi in rejecting the application for registration u/s.12AB of the Act.

2.

The ld. Counsel for the assessee at the outset submitted that the Ld. CIT(E) denied registration u/s.12AB by observing that the assessee did not comply with the notices calling for various details mentioned in the order.

3.

The Ld. Counsel submitted that the assessee had furnished part details which fact was also acknowledged by the Ld. CIT(E). The Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that the assessee could not furnish complete details either for the reason that the assessee has not received any notice or it took time to collate the details called for. The Ld. Counsel for the assessee submits that given an opportunity, the assessee is ready to comply with the notices issued by the ld. CIT(E) and file all the details called for by the Ld. CIT(E).

4.

Heard rival contentions. On hearing both the parties we are of the view that the assessee be provided one more opportunity to comply with the directions of the Ld. CIT(E) and to file all the necessary details and documents called by the Ld. CIT(E) in order to dispose of the application for registration u/s.12A of the Act. Thus, we restore this issue to the file of the Ld. CIT(E) who shall decide the issue afresh after providing adequate opportunity of being heard to the assessee.

5.

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open court on 28.01.2026.

More judgments on Section 12AB

All 5,972 judgments and leading authorities on Section 12AB →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →