FIBERHOME INDIA (P) LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-7(1), NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the TPO's computation of ALP for interest on ECBs was flawed, particularly by deviating from the consistent treatment in prior assessment years. The Tribunal directed the deletion of the addition made on account of interest on ECBs.
What were the facts?
The assessee company, Fiberhome India (P) Ltd., filed a return declaring a loss. The case was selected for scrutiny, and due to international transactions, it was referred to the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO). The TPO made significant adjustments to the Arm's Length Price (ALP) concerning the import of goods and interest on External Commercial Borrowings (ECBs).
What were the issues?
The primary issues involved the correctness of the TPO's determination of Arm's Length Price for international transactions, including the import of goods and interest on ECBs, and whether the TPO followed the directions of the Dispute Resolution Panel and principles of consistency.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 143(3),Section 144C(13),Section 144B,Section 92CA(3),Section 144C(5),Section 14,Section 234A,Section 234B
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “I”: NEW DELHI
Before: Ms. MADHUMITA ROY & SHRI MANISH AGARWAL
PER Ms. MADHUMITA ROY, JM: The instant appeal, filed by the assessee, is directed against the Assessment Order dated 29.10.2024 [DIN: ITBA/AST/S/143(3)/2024-25/1070024806(1)], passed by the Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department, under Section 143(3) r.w.s. 144C(13) read with Section 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”), pursuant to the directions of the Dispute Resolution Panel (“DRP”) under Section 144C(5) of the Act for the Assessment Year 2021-22. 2. Grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are as under:
2 “1. That the learned Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department ("AO") has erre
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 144C(13)
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 486/HYD/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 498/HYD/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 2128/MUM/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 4558/MUM/2023[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Giri Paints vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026
- Rahul Radheshyam Chauhan vs. Union Of INDIA Thru The Sec. Ministry Of Law And Justice And OrsBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- S.Murugesan vs. The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Annai Garden vs. The Commercial Tax Officer / The State Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Yadeshwar Mallekedi vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 15 Oct 2026