No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, VISAKHAPATNAM BENCH, VISAKHAPATNAM
Before: SHRI V. DURGA RAO & SHRI D.S. SUNDER SINGH
आदेश / O R D E R
PER D.S. SUNDER SINGH, Accountant Member:
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against order of the
Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-2, {CIT(A)},Guntur vide ITA
No.130/2011-12 dated 15.6.2016 for the assessment year 2009-10.
ITA No.369 /Vizag/2016 Vidyodaya Educational Society, VSKP 2. The assessee is an educational institution and filed the return of
income for the AY 2009- declaring Nil income on 26.10.2010. The
assessee claimed exemption u/s 10(23C) of the Income Tax Act, 1961
(hereinafter called as 'the Act') stating that the gross receipts of the
assessee does not exceed Rs.1.00 crore. The case was selected for
scrutiny and during the assessment proceedings, the A.O. observed that
the assessee had received gross receipts of ` 19,65,000/- and claimed
the expenditure to the extent of ` 19,46,330/- under various heads such
as salaries, vehicle maintenance, office expenses, insurance,
depreciation, interest on loan, etc. and arrived at the net income over
expenditure of ` 18,670/- and claimed the same as exemption u/s
10(23C) of the Act. The assessee claimed that it is an educational
institution and the gross receipts are less than ` 1 crore, hence, the
assessee is entitled for exemption u/s 10(23C) of the Act. The assessing
officer called for the books of accounts and during the assessment
proceedings the A.O. found that the entire expenditure is not supported
by vouchers. The assessee also did not produce the books of accounts
and the assessee did not furnish copy of the registration u/s 12A of the
Act. Hence, the A.O. held that the assessee is not entitled for
exemption u/s 11 of the Act and for the assessee’s failure to produce
books of accounts and the relevant vouchers, the A.O. disbelieved the
ITA No.369 /Vizag/2016 Vidyodaya Educational Society, VSKP claim of the assessee that it is existing solely for educational purpose
and accordingly, rejected the claim of the assessee u/s 10(23C) of the
Act and assessed the entire gross receipts of ` 19,65,000/- at maximum
marginal rate.
Aggrieved by the order of the A.O., the assessee went on appeal
before the CIT(A) and argued that the assessee is an educational
institution and the income is exempt u/s 10(23C) of the Act since the
gross receipts do not exceed ` 1.00 crore. The assessee also submitted
that in the absence of registration u/s 12A of the Act, the A.O., cannot
deny the exemption u/s 10(23C) of the Act. The Ld. CIT(A) called for
the remand report from the A.O. and the A.O. furnished the remand
report stating that the assessee produced books of accounts at remand
stage i.e. cash book and ledger and on verification of the books of
accounts with relevant vouchers, it was found that the entire
expenditure was incurred in cash and on self-made vouchers. Further
the A.O., stated in the remand report that the assessee failed to produce
bills even for payment of electrical charges, telephone charges etc. The
assessee also did not produce any bank account statement and failed to
prove the genuineness of the expenditure since it was incurred on self -
made vouchers. The Ld. CIT(A) considered the remand report and the
submissions made by the assessee and held that the assessee is not 3
ITA No.369 /Vizag/2016 Vidyodaya Educational Society, VSKP eligible for exemption u/s 10(23C) of the Act. The Ld.CIT(A) also held
that the assessee failed to produce evidence in respect of the
expenditure and has to be treated as not existing solely for educational
purpose but existing for profit motive and for the benefit of
management, accordingly, upheld the order of the A.O. to tax the entire
receipts at maximum marginal rate.
Aggrieved by the order of the A.O., the assessee is in appeal
before us. During the appeal hearing, the Ld. A.R. argued that the
assessee is a registered society registered under Societies Act, 1860.
Assessee also placed copy of registration certificate in page No.41 of the
paper book and argued that in case of society, the income of the
assessee cannot be charged at maximum marginal rate. As per section
167B of the Act in case a society, registered under Societies Act, the
income shall be charged at normal rates. Accordingly, argued that the
assessing officer as well as the CIT(A) have committed error in
assessing the income of the assessee at the maximum marginal rate.
The next submission of the assessee is that the assessee is an
educational institution and the gross receipts of the assessee were less
than ` 1.00 crore, hence argued that the assessee’s income is entitled
ITA No.369 /Vizag/2016 Vidyodaya Educational Society, VSKP for exemption u/s 10(23C) of the Act, thus requested for exemption u/s
10(23C) of the Act.
The third argument of the assessee is even if it is presumed that
the assessee is existing for profit motive and for the benefit of
management, the A.O. has taxed the entire receipts which is not correct.
The assessee has incurred the expenditure under the head salaries,
vehicle maintenance, telephone charges, electrical charges, office
expenses, depreciation, etc. Therefore, even if it is presumed that the
assessee is carrying on business activity, the entire receipts cannot be
treated as income and only the profit element should be assessed to tax,
hence requested to estimate the reasonable income as an alternative
submission.
On the other hand, the Ld. D.R. strongly supported the order of
the lower authorities.
We have heard both the parties, perused the materials available
on record and gone through the orders of the authorities below. In the
instant case, though the assessee is claimed to have running educational
institution solely for educational purpose, the assessee has not
established with relevant evidences, books of accounts and the
documents that the assessee is solely engaged for the education.
ITA No.369 /Vizag/2016 Vidyodaya Educational Society, VSKP Therefore, we do not find any infirmity in the order of the lower
authorities, hence, the assessee’s ground for treating the institution as
educational institution existing solely for the purpose of education is
dismissed. Accordingly, the assessee is not entitled for exemption u/s
10(23C) of the Act.
The next submission of the assessee is that the entire gross
receipts should not be treated as income and only the profit element
required to be assessed to tax. In this case, the assessee has received
the gross receipts of ` 19,65,000/- and the assessee has produced the
books of accounts, bills and vouchers before the A.O. Though the bills
and vouchers are incurred in self- made vouchers, the entire receipt
cannot be income and taxed. Once it is believed that the assessee is
carrying on business activity, the expenditure relatable to earning
income required to be allowed as deduction. In the instant case, as per
the books of accounts and the profit & loss account, the gross receipts
of the assessee were ` 19,65,000/- and the expenditure was `
19,64,330/- resulting in profit of ` 18,670/-. As per the assessment
order, the assessee has claimed the expenditure such as salaries, vehicle
maintenance, office expenses, insurance, depreciation, interest on loans
and telephone charges, etc., but there was no proper evidence. During
the appeal hearing, for a query from the bench, the Ld. A.R. expressed 6
ITA No.369 /Vizag/2016 Vidyodaya Educational Society, VSKP no objection for estimation of income @ 20% of the gross receipts. We
have gone through the submissions of the assessee as well as orders of
the lower authorities and the arguments of the Ld.DR and of the view
that the estimation of income @ 20% of the gross receipts is
reasonable, accordingly, we direct the A.O. to estimate the income @
20% on gross receipts and assessess the same as income. The
assessee’s appeal on this ground is partly allowed.
The next submission of the assessee is taxing the income at
maximum marginal rate. As per section 167B of the Act, in case of an
assessee registered under Socieites Act, the same is excluded for taxing
the income at for maximum marginal rate. For ready reference we
extract relevant part of Section 167B(1) of the Act which reads as
under:
167B. (1) Where the individual shares of the members of an association of persons or body of individuals (other than a company or a co-operative society or a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 (21 of 1860) or under any law corresponding to that Act in force in any part of India) in the whole or any part of the income of such association or body are indeterminate or unknown, tax shall be charged on the total income of the association or body at the maximum marginal rate :
Plain reading of section 167B of the Act indicates that the
income of company or cooperative society or a society registered under
ITA No.369 /Vizag/2016 Vidyodaya Educational Society, VSKP Societies Act of 1860 are excluded from charging the tax at maximum
marginal rate ( MMR ) and would be chargeable at normal rates. In
the similar facts and circumstances, the coordinate bench of ITAT in ITA
Nos.212 to 215/vizag/2014 in the case of Sri Lakshmiganapathi Seva
Samithi Vs. CIT dated 26.8.2016 held that in case of society, the
application of maximum marginal rate does not arise. For ready
reference, we reproduce the extract of relevant part of the order of the
Tribunal in para No.13 which reads as under:
“13. ………..As regards the applicability of maximum marginal rate of tax is concerned, the CIT was of the opinion that the A.O. ought to have applied maximum marginal rate of tax to the income of the society. But, the fact is that once the society is registered under the Societies Registration Act, the applicability of maximum marginal rate does not arise, it is because the societies are registered under the Societies Registration Act are prohibited from distribution of any surplus to its members. Once the distribution of profit to its members is prohibited, the question of determination of share of each individual member does not arise. Hence, the CIT was not correct in coming to the conclusion that the rate of tax applicable to the assessee is maximum marginal rate of tax without understanding the provisions.” 11. The assessee is a society registered under Societies Act, 1860 as
evidenced from the registration certificate. The facts are similar in
this case, therefore, following the decision of coordinate bench and
section 167B of the Act, we hold that the income of the assessee is to
be taxed at normal rates but not at maximum marginal rate,
accordingly, we set aside the order of the Ld. CIT(A) and allow the
appeal of the assessee on this ground.
ITA No.369 /Vizag/2016 Vidyodaya Educational Society, VSKP 12. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed.
The above order was pronounced in the open court on 26th Apr’18.
Sd/- Sd/- (वी. दुगा�राव) ( ड.एस. . . . सु�दर "संह) (V. DURGA RAO) (D.S. SUNDER SINGH) �या�यक सद�य/JUDICIAL MEMBER लेखा सद�य/ACCOUNTANT MEMBER #वशाखापटणम /Visakhapatnam: 'दनांक /Dated : 26.04.2018 VG/SPS आदेश क� ��त)ल#प अ*े#षत/Copy of the order forwarded to:-
अपीलाथ� / The Appellant – Vidyodaya Educational Society, Chinnamushidivada, Visakhapatnam 2. ��याथ� / The Respondent – The DCIT, Circle-4(1), Visakhapatnam 3. आयकर आयु+त / The Pr. CIT-2,Visakhapatnam 4. आयकर आयु+त (अपील) / The CIT (A)-2, Visakhapatnam 5. #वभागीय ��त�न.ध, आय कर अपील�य अ.धकरण, #वशाखापटणम / DR, ITAT, Visakhapatnam 6. गाड� फ़ाईल / Guard file आदेशानुसार / BY ORDER // True Copy // Sr. Private Secretary ITAT, VISAKHAPATNAM