THE VIJAYAWADA MACHINERY MERCHANTS ASSOCIATION,VIJAYAWADA vs. THE CIT, VIJAYAWADA, VIJAYAWADA
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner's decision, stating that the association's primary object was to protect the interests of its members, not to carry out activities for the public at large or for general public utility. Therefore, it was not eligible for registration under section 12AA.
What were the facts?
The Vijayawada Machinery Merchants Association applied for registration under section 12AA of the Income Tax Act. The Commissioner rejected the application, observing that the association's activities were restricted to membership subscriptions and did not involve charitable activities for the public, deeming it a mutual concern.
What were the issues?
Whether an association formed primarily to protect the interests of its members, funded by their subscriptions, qualifies as a charitable institution for registration under Section 12AA.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(2)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Andhra Chamber of Commerce167 citing55 ITR 722 · 1965 · SC · Read judgment
- 1) CIT v. A.P. Bankers & Pawnbrokers Association3 citing170 ITR 476 · 1988 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, VISAKHAPATNAM BENCH, VISAKHAPATNAM
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL VISAKHAPATNAM BENCH, VISAKHAPATNAM BEFORE SHRI V. DURGA RAO, HON’BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI D.S. SUNDER SINGH, HON’BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No. 688/VIZ/2013 The Vijayawada Machinery vs. CIT, Vijayawada. Merchants Association, D.No.11-39-11, Katurivari Street, Vijayawada. PAN No. AABAT 8447 L (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri I. Kama Sastry, FCA. Department By : Shri Deba Kumar Sonawal, CIT DR Date of hearing : 23/04/2018. Date of pronouncement : 26/04/2018. O R D E R PER V. DURGA RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER
This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax, Vijayawada, dated 26/09/2013. 2. Facts of the case, in brief, are that the assessee-The Vijayawada Machinery Merchants Association is a registered society, filed an application for registration under section 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as "Act") with the following main objects:- a) To promote and encourage unanimity and friendly feeling among the machinery merchants carrying on trade in mills stores, oil engines, expeller and gin machinery spare parts
2 ITA No.688/VIZ/2013 (The Vijayawada Machinery Merchants Association)
and other allied machinery; tractors, pump-sets and other agricultural machinery and equipment; workshop and foundry equipment and machinery, equipment, spare parts etc. and to find ways and means to develop the trade in the above lines and to all that is necessary in this direction without any restriction of any caste, creed, religion or community. b) To organize, maintain, protect, promote and assist the rights and interest of the association.
The ld. Commissioner, by considering the objects and also the source of funds, observed that all the receipts of the assessee are annual membership subscription paid by the members. The activities of the assessee are restricted to the contribution from the members. No expenditure is incurred towards any charitable activity. The primary object of the society is to promote and encourage unanimity and friendly feeling among the machinery merchants and, therefore, assessee cannot be treated as a charitable association, but is a mutual concern and, rejected for registration under section 12AA of the Act. 3. On being aggrieved, assessee carried the matter in appeal before the Tribunal. 4. Ld. Authorised Representative for the assessee has submitted that The Vijayawada Machinery Merchants Association
3 ITA No.688/VIZ/2013 (The Vijayawada Machinery Merchants Association)
is a charitable association and the ld. Commissioner is not correct in rejecting the registration under section 12AA of the Act. Ld.Authorised Representative further submitted that the case of the assessee is covered by that the advancement of any other object of general public utility. He further submitted that the assessee-society is existed to promote the trade and therefore, assessee is entitled for 12AA registration. He relied on the following case laws in support of his contentions:- 1) CIT vs. A.P. Bankers & Pawnbrokers Association [(1998) 170 ITR 476]. 2) CIT vs. Andhra Chamber of Commerce [(1965) 55 ITR 722)] 3) ACIT vs. Delhi Brick Kiln Owners Association [(1980) 4 Taxman 420 (Delhi)] 4) Andhra Pradesh Grain & Seeds Merchants Association vs. DCIT (E) [ITA No. 1242/Hyderabad/2013, dated 01/04/2014 (Hyderabad Tribunal)]
On the other hand, ld. Departmental Representative relied on the order passed by the Commissioner. 6. We have heard both the parties, perused the material available on record and gone through orders of the authorities below.
4 ITA No.688/VIZ/2013 (The Vijayawada Machinery Merchants Association)
The assessee-The Vijayawada Machinery Merchants Association is a registered society and one of the main objects is to promote and encourage unanimity and friendly feeling among the machinery merchants carrying on trade in mills stores, oil engines, expeller and gin machinery spare parts and other allied machinery. It further provides that to organize, maintain, protect, promote and assist the rights and interests of the association. From the above objects, it is crystal clear that the assessee is existed for the purpose to protect the interest of its members, i.e. specified individuals, who are the members of the association and contribute subscription and the same is utilized for their benefit. The assessee is not carrying on any useful activity towards public at large or at least a class of the people. We also find that the case of the assessee is not covered advancement of any other general public utility. We find that the assessee is not carrying out any activity for promotion of trading. It is existed only for specified individuals, who are the members of the association. Therefore, assessee is not entitled for registration under section 12AA of the Act as has rightly been observed by the ld.Commissioner that the assessee is a mutual association. We also find that the assessee-society is only existed to protect the interest of the members of The Vijayawada Machinery Merchants
5 ITA No.688/VIZ/2013 (The Vijayawada Machinery Merchants Association)
Association and is only related to the members of the association and not doing anything towards promotion of trading. Under these facts and circumstances of the case, we are of the opinion that the ld. CIT(A) rightly rejected the registration under section 12AA of the Act to the assessee. Under similar set of facts, the coordinate bench of the tribunal has considered the same issue in the case of The Eluru Jewellers & Bullion Merchants Association vs. CIT in ITA No. 419/Vizag/2012, dated 30/11/2016, wherein it has been held as under:- “9. We have heard both the parties, perused the materials available on record and gone through the orders of the authorities below. The assessee association was formed in the year 1947 with the main objects to protect the interest of the jewellers and bullion merchants. Though some of the objects provide for charity, particularly object no.9 i.e. collecting the donations for the benefit of the poor and under privileged and providing financial help to the poor students for their education. From the details filed by the assessee, we find that since 1947, the assessee has not carried out any charitable activity particularly to help the poor students except some negligible income they have incurred for the purpose of charity. The assessee society is only existed to protect the interests of the jewellers and bullion merchants of Eluru town and to protect their personal interest. Even it is not existed to protect the interest of the trade at large but only it is existed for few members who are doing business in a particular town. We find that the assessee is only existed for the benefit of few members particularly who are carrying business activity in Eluru town and it cannot be said that the assessee is doing charity. Charity means to help the poor who are in need. In this case, assessee has not done anything to the poor people who are in need, who are suffering with ill health, etc., etc. The Commissioner in his order has observed that the society was formed for the welfare of the gold and bullion merchants of Eluru by the members for the benefit of the members. Such society cannot be considered for the purpose of charity. We find that the Ld. Commissioner correctly held that assessee cannot be
6 ITA No.688/VIZ/2013 (The Vijayawada Machinery Merchants Association)
considered as a charitable organization. A society is formed for the benefit of themselves, it can only be said that it is a mutual benefit to each other. It cannot be said that people started an association for the benefit of themselves is a charity. The concept of charity means doing something to others who are in poor and helpless condition. The assessee association existed for the people who are in a trade, they are neither poor nor helpless. All the members of the association existed for the purpose of carrying their business with a profit motive. Charity is an anti- thesis of profit. In view of the above, we find that the assessee society is not eligible for registration u/s 12AA of the Act. So far as case laws relied upon by the Ld. Counsel for the assessee is concerned, we have considered each case carefully and find that facts are entirely different from the case in hand. Therefore, those case laws are not relevant to decide the issue before us.” 8. Keeping in view of the facts and circumstances of the case and also by following the decision of the coordinate bench of the tribunal in the above referred to case, we find no infirmity in the order passed by the ld. Commissioner. So far as case laws relied on by the assessee are concerned, they have no application to the facts of the present case. Thus, this appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed. 9. In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed. Order Pronounced in open Court on this 26th day of April, 2018.
Sd/- sd/- (D.S. SUNDER SINGH) (V. DURGA RAO) Accountant Member Judicial Member Dated : 26th April, 2018. vr/-
7 ITA No.688/VIZ/2013 (The Vijayawada Machinery Merchants Association)
Copy to: 1. The Assessee - The Vijayawada Machinery Merchants Association, D.No.11-39-11, Katurivari Street, Vijayawada. 2. The Revenue – CIT, Vijayawada. 3. The D.R., Visakhapatnam. 4. Guard file. By order
(VUKKEM RAMBABU) Sr. Private Secretary, ITAT, Visakhapatnam.
More judgments on Section 12AA
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2448/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2447/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Sri Jawahar Education Trust, Chamarajanagar vs The Income Tax Officer Ward 1…ITA 1735/BANG/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed5 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(1), MohaliITA 636/CHANDI/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 635/CHANDI/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Mehra Mac Industries Private Limited vs. The Deputy State Tax OfficerTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- Santosh Das And Anr. vs. Union Of INDIACalcutta · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S Rama Krishna Industries vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 30 Oct 2026
- Smt Usha W/O Shri Tarun vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maruti Nandan Minetech Private Limited vs. The Joint CommissionerRajasthan · 29 Oct 2026