ARJUN SINGH,PALWAL vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(1), FARIDABAD
Facts
The assessee, a farmer, sold ancestral agricultural land and received an advance of ₹1.18 crores in cash. The sale deed was registered for ₹1.18 crores, and the assessee confirmed receiving cash and cheque payments totaling ₹4.66 crores for the sale. The Assessing Officer (AO) made an addition of ₹61,50,000/- as income from undisclosed sources.
Held
The Tribunal held that the assessee received ₹1.18 crores in cash as an advance for the sale of agricultural land, which was confirmed by the sale deed. The assessee had sufficient cash balance to explain the cash deposit in the bank account. Therefore, the addition made by the AO was not justified.
Key Issues
Whether the addition of ₹61,50,000/- made by the AO as income from undisclosed sources was justified, given the explanation provided by the assessee regarding the cash received from the sale of agricultural land.
Sections Cited
143(3), 147, 131(1)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “E”: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH & SHRI M. BALAGANESH
INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH “E”: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI M. BALAGANESH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No. 5095/Del/2025 (Assessment Year: 2013-14) Arjun Singh, Vs. Income Tax Officer, H. No. 1014, Prithla, Palwarl, Ward-1(1), Haryana Faridabad (Appellant) (Respondent) PAN: EICPS8476L
Assessee by : Shri Charitra Gupta, CA Shri Deepak Garg, CA Revenue by: Ms. Ankush Kalra, Sr. DR Date of Hearing 17/02/2026 Date of pronouncement 17/02/2026
O R D E R PER M. BALAGANESH, AM 1. The appeal in ITA No.5095/Del/2025 for AY 2013-14, arises out of the order of the ld National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [hereinafter referred to as ‘ld. CIT(A)’, in short] dated 27.01.2025 against the order of assessment passed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) dated 28.12.2018 by the Assessing Officer, ITO, Ward-1(1), Faridabad (hereinafter referred to as ‘ld. AO’).
The only issue to be decided in this appeal is as to whether the ld CIT(A) was justified in confirming the addition made by the ld AO in the sum of
ITA No. 5095/Del/2025 Arjun Singh
₹61,50,000/- as income from undisclosed sources in the facts and circumstances of the instant case.
We have heard the rival submissions and perused the materials available on record. The assessee is a farmer in a village in Haryana and derived income only from agricultural activities and hence not liable to file any income tax return. The assessee during the year under consideration had sold a part of ancestral agricultural land to one Shri Ram Niwas, S/o Shri Tej Ram who later got it registered in the name of his grandfather Shri Deep Chand. The assessee received advance in cash of ₹1.18 crores against the proposed sale of part of ancestral agricultural land. The sale deed was finally registered on 11.03.2013 for ₹1.18 crores. The copy of the sale deed together with the complete revenue records are enclosed in pages 21 to 39 of the paper book filed before us. It is pertinent to note that the registered sale deed duly captures the payment of advance of ₹1.18 crores paid in cash by the buyer to the assessee. Further, during the course of assessment proceedings, the ld AO recorded a statement of the assessee u/s 131(1) of the Act on oath on 14.12.2018, where the assessee had duly confirmed the aforesaid transactions and also stated that the cash receipts by the assessee had been deposited in the bank account of the assessee, apart from receipt of cheque of ₹4.66 Crores on sale of ancestral agricultural land, even though registry was done only for ₹1.18 crores. It is pertinent to note that the ld AO had not whispered about the receipt of amounts of cheque amounting to ₹4.66 Crores on sale of agricultural land in his assessment order and had not even sought to tax the same in the assessment. Since, this is not the subject matter of adjudication, we are not going into the said aspect. The statement on oath taken from the assessee clearly shows both cheque receipts as well as cash receipts on sale of ancestral agricultural land.
ITA No. 5095/Del/2025 Arjun Singh
The assessee had deposited ₹1,22,50,000/- in his bank account till 12.03.2013 in his bank account. The assessee has withdrawn cash from till 12.03.2013 in the sum of ₹61,50,000/-, which was accepted by the AO as available cash source. Further for the remaining sum of ₹61 lakh, the assessee had sufficient cash balance in the form of advance received on sale of ancestral agricultural land in the sum of ₹1.18 crores. This fact is proved beyond reasonable doubt since the registration of sale deed contained the receipt of cash of ₹1.18 crores by the assessee. Hence, the explanation offered by the assessee that ₹1.18 crores was received in cash on sale of ancestral agricultural land deserves to be accepted and consequentially the same is available as a cash source to explain the cash deposit made in the bank account. Hence, there cannot be any addition that could be made in the hands of the assessee on account of cash deposit. Accordingly, grounds raised by the assessee on merits are allowed. Since, the relief is granted to the assessee on merits, the other legal grounds raised by the assessee need not be gone into and they are left open.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 17/02/2026.
-Sd/- -Sd/- (MAHAVIR SINGH) (M. BALAGANESH) VICE PRESIDENT ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
Dated: 24/02/2026 A K Keot Copy forwarded to 1. Applicant
ITA No. 5095/Del/2025 Arjun Singh
Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT (A) 5. DR:ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT, New Delhi
