SHIV SHANKAR AGARWAL HUF,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O.,WARD-36(2), KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The assessee sought permission to withdraw the appeal as they intended to settle the issue under the 'Vivad se Vishwas Scheme'. The Tribunal granted this permission.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed exemption under Section 10(38) for long-term capital gains from the sale of shares. The Assessing Officer (AO) and the Commissioner (Appeals) disallowed this claim.
What were the issues?
Whether the claim for exemption under Section 10(38) for long-term capital gains on sale of shares is valid. The appeal was withdrawn by the assessee before adjudication on merits.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA BENCH ‘(SMC
Before: Shri P.M. Jagtap(KZ)]
order : June 16 , 2020 ORDER This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of Ld. CIT(A) – 10, Kolkata dated 25.07.2019 and the solitary issue involved therein relates to the addition of Rs. 15,72,907/- made by the AO and confirmed by the Ld. CIT(A) by disallowing the claim of the assessee for exemption u/s 10(38) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by treating the long term capital gain claimed to be arising from the sale of shares of M/s. Kailash Auto Finance Limited.
At the time of hearing fixed in this case today, the learned counsel for the assessee has sought permission of the bench to withdraw this appeal on the ground that the assessee is in the process of settling the issue involved in this appeal under ‘Vivad se Vishwas Scheme’. Since the ld. DR has not raised any objection in this regard,
Assessment Year: 2015-16 Shiv Shankar Agarwal HUF the permission as sought by the assessee is granted and this appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed. Order Pronounced in the Open Court on 16th June, 2020.
More judgments on Section 10(38)
- Shalin Jayantbhai Desai, Vadodara vs ACIT, Circle-4(2), Vadodara Present…ITA 2569/AHD/2026[2010-11]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2010-11
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2370/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2369/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Karan Dilipkumar Patel L/H of Late… vs Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Vapi…ITA 353/SRT/2024[2011-12]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2011-12
- Jay Patel, Raipur vs ITO, Ward-3(1), RaipurITA 684/RPR/2026[2015-16]Status: Heard12 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dwaraka Jewellers, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S N D Waddar And Co vs. Sri Gaurav GuptaKarnataka · 30 Oct 2026
- Kanwar Enterprises Private Limited vs. The Joint Commissioner - State TaxTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bangi Mines And Minerals vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Arka Business Solutions vs. Principal Commissioner Of CustomsTelangana · 30 Oct 2026