M/S NANDANA EDUCATION TRUST,SHIMOGGA vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX CIRCLE-1, SHIMOGGA
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that since the assessment order under challenge had been set aside by the Ld. Commissioner, the present appeal had become infructuous and could not survive.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an assessment order. However, the Ld. Commissioner had previously set aside the assessment order under Section 263. The assessee had appealed this revision order to the ITAT but did not succeed and accepted that order.
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal against an assessment order that has been set aside by a higher authority is maintainable.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, BANGALORE BENCHES : “B”, BANGALORE
Before: SHRI B.R.BASKARAN & SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE, JUDICAL MEMBER
PER SHRI B.R.BASKARAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
The assessee has filed this appeal challenging the order dated 01-03-2018 passed by Ld CIT(A), Davangere and it relates to the assessment year 2010-11.
The Ld Counsel appearing for the assessee submitted that the impugned assessment order has been set aside by the Ld Administrative Commissioner in the revision order passed u/s 263 of the Act. He submitted that the assessee had challenged the above said revision order by filing appeal before 2 the ITAT, but could not succeed. He submitted that the assessee has accepted the order passed by the ITAT by not challenging the same before Hon’ble High Court. When asked the Ld A.R to furnish a copy of order passed by the Tribunal against the Revision order, he submitted that the submissions made by him are true facts, since he only had appeared before the Tribunal. He submitted that the statement made by him at the bar may be accepted.
The Ld A.R, accordingly, submitted that the impugned assessment order no longer exists in the eyes of law, since the same has been revised by Ld CIT u/s 263 of the Act. He submitted that the assessing officer has already passed the assessment order to give effect to the revision order passed by Ld CIT. Accordingly he submitted that the present appeal filed by the assessee shall become infructuous.
We heard Ld D.R. Having regard to the statement made by Ld A.R at the bar, we are of the opinion that the present appeal shall not survive, since the assessment order from which the present appeal arises has been set aside by Ld CIT. Accordingly we dismiss the same as infructuous.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S. Sikka Motors PVT LTD vs. Union Of INDIA & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shri Yaras Suresh Babu Prabhu Kumar vs. The Union Of INDIATelangana · 27 Oct 2026
- Santa Singh vs. SuperintendentUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Azaad Builders vs. Assistant Commissioner SGSTUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026