M/S NANDANA EDUCATION TRUST,SHIMOGGA vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX CIRCLE-1, SHIMOGGA

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1551/BANG/2018Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore04 July 2019AY 2010-113 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that since the assessment order under challenge had been set aside by the Ld. Commissioner, the present appeal had become infructuous and could not survive.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal against an assessment order. However, the Ld. Commissioner had previously set aside the assessment order under Section 263. The assessee had appealed this revision order to the ITAT but did not succeed and accepted that order.

What were the issues?

Whether an appeal against an assessment order that has been set aside by a higher authority is maintainable.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 263

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, BANGALORE BENCHES : “B”, BANGALORE

Before: SHRI B.R.BASKARAN & SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE, JUDICAL MEMBER

For Appellant: Shri A.R.Vivek, Advocate
For Respondent: Shri Siddappajji, Addl.CIT

PER SHRI B.R.BASKARAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

1.

The assessee has filed this appeal challenging the order dated 01-03-2018 passed by Ld CIT(A), Davangere and it relates to the assessment year 2010-11.

2.

The Ld Counsel appearing for the assessee submitted that the impugned assessment order has been set aside by the Ld Administrative Commissioner in the revision order passed u/s 263 of the Act. He submitted that the assessee had challenged the above said revision order by filing appeal before 2 the ITAT, but could not succeed. He submitted that the assessee has accepted the order passed by the ITAT by not challenging the same before Hon’ble High Court. When asked the Ld A.R to furnish a copy of order passed by the Tribunal against the Revision order, he submitted that the submissions made by him are true facts, since he only had appeared before the Tribunal. He submitted that the statement made by him at the bar may be accepted.

3.

The Ld A.R, accordingly, submitted that the impugned assessment order no longer exists in the eyes of law, since the same has been revised by Ld CIT u/s 263 of the Act. He submitted that the assessing officer has already passed the assessment order to give effect to the revision order passed by Ld CIT. Accordingly he submitted that the present appeal filed by the assessee shall become infructuous.

4.

We heard Ld D.R. Having regard to the statement made by Ld A.R at the bar, we are of the opinion that the present appeal shall not survive, since the assessment order from which the present appeal arises has been set aside by Ld CIT. Accordingly we dismiss the same as infructuous.

5.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

More judgments on Section 263

All 13,616 judgments and leading authorities on Section 263 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →