SRI GOVINDA BEHARILAL THAKURAL,BANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1(2)(1), BANGALORE

PDF · subscribers
ITA 775/BANG/2019Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore09 July 2019AY 2013-144 pages
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal before the CIT(A) due to the assessee not receiving the original assessment order. The matter was restored to the CIT(A) for adjudication on merits, subject to payment of costs by the assessee.

What were the facts?

The assessee did not receive the assessment order and obtained a certified copy later. The appeal was filed within 30 days of receiving the certified copy, but the CIT(A) dismissed it due to a perceived delay and lack of response from the assessee to notices.

What were the issues?

Whether the delay in filing the appeal before the CIT(A) was justifiable, and whether the assessee should be given an opportunity to present their case on merits.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 143(3)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B’’ BENCH : BANGALORE

Before: SHRI B.R BASKARAN & SMT. BEENA PILLAI

For Appellant: Shri S.V Ravishankar, Advocate
For Respondent: Shri R.N Siddappaji, Addl. CIT
Hearing: 09.07.2019Pronounced: 09.07.2019

O R D E R

Per B.R Baskaran, Accountant Member

1.

The appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 16/1/2019 passed by ld CIT(A)-1, Bangalore and it relates to asst. year 2013-14.

2.

The assessee is aggrieved by the decision of ld CIT(A) in dismissing the appeal in limini, without condoning the delay.

3.

We heard the parties and perused the record. The assessee is engaged in the business of construction and sale of plots under joint venture. The assessment was completed by an order dated 31/3/2016 passed u/s 143(3) of the Act, wherein the AO disallowed claim of penalty of Rs.15,000/- and also added unexplained credit of Rs.54.17 lakhs. According to the assessee, he did not receive the copy of asst. order and hence he applied for certified copy of the same before the AO, which was given to the assessee on 8/9/2016. The assessee filed the appeal before the ld CIT(A) on 23/9/2016, i.e., within the limitation period of 30 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order. The ld CIT(A) posted the appeal for hearing on several dates but the assessee did not respond to the same. Some of the notices were returned back un-served by the postal department. Hence, the ld CIT(A) sent the notice by email also but there was no response from the assessee. Further, the ld CIT(A) also took the view that there is a delay of 146 days in filing the appeal if the date of assessment order is taken into consideration. Accordingly, he dismissed the appeal of the assessee in limine. The assessee is aggrieved.

4.

The ld AR submitted that the assessee did not receive the copy of assessment order and hence the assessee was constrained to obtain certified copy of the order, which was given to the assessee on 8/9/2016. The assessee has filed the appeal within 30 days from the date of receipt of the certified copy of the order. He submitted that the assessee could not appear before the ld CIT(A) for the reasons beyond his control. Accordingly he prayed that the technical delay, if any, in filing the appeal before the ld CIT(A) may be condoned and the matter may be restored to the file of the ld CIT(A) for adjudicating the grounds on merits.

5.

We heard ld DR and perused the record. Considering the fact that the assessee has obtained certified copy of the order only on 8/9/2016 in view of non receipt of original assessment order, we are of the view that there is reasonable cause for the assessee in filing the appeal belatedly before the ld CIT(A). Accordingly we condone the delay in filing the appeal before the ld CIT(A).

6.

Before us, the assessee has not given any explanation for not responding to the notices and email sent by the assessee. At the same time, in the interest of natural justice, we are of the view that the assessee should be provided with an opportunity to present his case before ld CIT(A). Accordingly we are of the view that the assessee should bear cost for being delinquent. Accordingly we impose a cost of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five thousand) upon the assessee which shall be paid to the credit of the Income-tax Department as ‘other fees’ within 30 days from the date of receipt of this order. Subject to the payment of the above said cost, we set aside the order passed by the ld CIT(A) and restore all the issues to his file for adjudicating them on merits.

7.

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.

Order pronounced in the Open Court on 9th July, 2019.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →