VANDANA RAJENDRA THOTE,AMRAVATI vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER - WARD 5, AMRAVATI, AMRAVATI
Facts
The assessee challenged an order for AY 2019-20. There was a delay of 16 days in filing the appeal, which was condoned. The Assessing Officer made additions of Rs.5,70,380 and Rs.5 lakh related to the purchase of rural agricultural land, citing unexplained income and discrepancies with stamp duty valuation.
Held
The Tribunal noted that two additions were made on a single issue, which the Amicus Curiae argued was improper. The Tribunal also observed that the lower appellate authority had dismissed the appeal due to a delay without adjudicating on merits.
Key Issues
Whether two additions can be made on a single issue regarding property purchase? Whether the lower appellate authority was justified in dismissing the appeal due to delay without considering the merits?
Sections Cited
147, 144, 69, 115BBE
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” BENCH, NAGPUR
Before: SHRI NARENDER KUMAR CHOUDHRY
By this appeal, the assessee has challenged the impugned order
dated 13/02/2025, passed by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax
(Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi, [for short, “learned
Commissioner”] for the assessment year 2019–20.
There is a delay of 16 days in filing of this appeal. Ld. Amicus
Curiae, Ms. Darshana Bhaiya, has prayed for leniency, as the delay is
minuscule and has been explained by the assessee by filing a duly
sworn affidavit. Hence, the delay is condoned.
Vandana Rajendra Thote ITA no.318/Nag./2025
Coming to the merits of the case, this Court observe that the Assessing Officer, vide assessment order dated 25/01/2024, passed under section 147 r/w section 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short “the Act”), ultimately made the addition of Rs.5,70,380, being
purchase price of the rural agricultural land, situated at Amravati vide purchase deed dated 11/05/2018, on a total consideration of Rs.5 lakh,
as against the stamp duty, which was valued at Rs.10 lakh. The
Assessing Officer made the said addition of Rs.5,70,380 being
unexplained and in the absence of return of income and treating the said income, under section 69 r/w section 115BBE of the Act. The Assessing Officer further also made the addition of Rs.5 lakh being
difference between the actual consideration shown by the assessee and the stamp duty valuation. The Ld. Amicus Curiae has specifically raised the issue that as to how two additions on a single issue, can be made and, therefore, the additions are liable to be deleted.
On the contrary, the learned Departmental Representative submitted that admittedly the assessee has not filed any document in order to substantiate its claim qua purchase of property and there is a variation in the valuation shown by the assessee as well as the stamp
Vandana Rajendra Thote ITA no.318/Nag./2025
duty valuation, as is clear from the Registration Deed, as mentioned by
the Assessing Officer in Para–5 of the Assessment Order.
Having heard the parties and perused the material on record.
Though the contention raised by the learned Departmental
Representative to the effect that in the absence of relevant documents,
the Assessing Officer has rightly made the aforesaid addition, appears
to be correct however, considering the submissions made by the Amicus
Curiae and in view of the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case,
this Court is of the considered view that either of the additions required
to be deleted. This Court further find that there was a delay of 22 days
in filing first appeal before the learned Commissioner and therefore he
dismissed the assessee’s appeal in limine and without condoning the
delay and without touching the issues on merit. Therefore, in
cumulative effect, the issue involved as raised before the learned
Commissioner, remained to be adjudicated in its right perspective and
proper manner. Thus, considering peculiar facts and circumstances of
the case in totality, this Court is inclined to quash the assessment order
and consequently remand the entire matter to the file of the Assessing
Officer for decision afresh in terms as stated above and as claimed by
the Ld. Amicus Curiae, suffice to say that the Assessing Officer shall
provide reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee.
Vandana Rajendra Thote ITA no.318/Nag./2025
This Court appreciate and endorse the sincere efforts and able
assistance provided by the learned Amicus Curiae in coming to the right
conclusion and for passing the order in its right perspective and proper
manner and for substantial justice.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical
purposes.
Order pronounced in the open Court on 27.06.2025
Sd/- Sd/- N.K. CHOUDHRY JUDICIAL MEMBER
Copy of the order forwarded to:
(1) The Assessee; (2) The Revenue; (3) The PCIT / CIT (Judicial); (4) The DR, ITAT, Nagpur; and (5) Guard file. True Copy By Order Pradeep J. Chowdhury Sr. Private Secretary Sr. Private Secretary ITAT, Nagpur
