DCIT, DEHRADUN vs. M/S. GANGA REALTORS (P) LTD., DEHRADUN
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that as per CBDT Circular No. 3 of 2018, appeals with a tax effect below Rs. 20 lakhs should not be filed or pressed. The CIT(DR) did not press the appeal.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal before the ITAT against an order of the CIT(A) for AY 2008-09. The tax effect in the appeal was less than Rs. 20 lakhs.
What were the issues?
Whether the Revenue's appeal is maintainable given the low tax effect and the CBDT circular directing withdrawal of such appeals.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: ‘F’: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI K.N. CHARY & SHRI ANADEE NATH MISSHRA
This appeal by Revenue is filed against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-2, Aayakar Bhawan, Sanjay Place, M.G. Raod, Agra, [“Ld. CIT(A)”, for short], dated 31.03.2016, for Assessment Year 2008-09.
(2) Admittedly, the tax effect in the Departmental Appeal is less than Rs.20 lakhs. Vide Circular No. 3 of 2018 dated 11.07.2018 issued by Central Board of Direct Taxes (“CBDT”, for short) under section 268A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“I.T. Act”, for ITA No.- 4861/Del/2016. M/s Ganga Realtors (P) Ltd. short) it has been directed that Department shall not file appeal before the Tribunal in case where the tax effect does not exceed the monetary limit of Rs.20 lakhs. It is also directed that this instruction will apply retrospectively to the pending appeals and appeals to be filed henceforth in the Tribunal. It is also directed in this Circular, that pending appeals below the specified tax effect may be withdrawn/not pressed. Learned CIT(DR), who appeared on behalf of Revenue, did not press the appeal in view of the aforesaid Circular of CBDT. We may also note that this appeal of Revenue would not fall within the exceptions provided in the aforesaid Circular. In the result, the Departmental Appeal is not maintainable, in view of aforesaid CBDT Circular. The Appeal of Revenue is dismissed as withdrawn/not pressed by the Learned CIT(DR). We clarify that Revenue will be at liberty to file a miscellaneous application seeking recall of this order for restoration of the appeal, if it is found that the appeal of Revenue is not covered by aforesaid CBDT Circular.
(3) In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed. Order pronounced in the open court on 15th day of January, 2019
More judgments on Section 268A
- Income Tax Officer, Ajmer vs Hemant Kumar Sharma, AjmerITA 1506/JPR/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Income Tax Officer, Indore vs Aashta Doshi, IndoreITA 789/IND/2025[2024-25]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Income Tax Officer Ward -1(2)(3), Ahmedabad vs Khushal Madhavlal Darji, AhmedabadITA 82/AHD/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Mehsana vs Hemantkumar Faljibhai Chaudhary, MehsanaITA 475/AHD/2025[2012-13]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
- Dy. CIT-4(1), Indore vs Kiran Bajpai, IndoreITA 426/IND/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed9 Sept 2026AY 2024-25
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Rohit Medical Systems vs. Commissioner Of Delhi Goods And Services Tax And Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Shivam Kumar vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Rajkalpana Travels PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner CGST, Delhi North CommissionerateDelhi · 28 Oct 2026