THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD-1(2)(3),, AHMEDABAD vs. SMT. MAMTA RAJIVKUMAR AGARWAL, AHMEDABAD

The Revenue is in appeal before the Tribunal against the order of the learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Ahmedabad-10 (“CIT(A)” in short) dated 20.02.2020 passed for Assessment Year 2013-2014.

The ground taken by the Revenue is as follows:- “The Ld. CIT(A) has erred in law and in the facts and in circumstances of the case by deleting the penalty of Rs.11,64,099/- under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act, 1961.”

At the time of hearing before us, none appeared on behalf of the assessee; however, since the issue in question is covered by CBDT Circular No. 17 of 2019 dated 08.08.2019, this appeal is decided ex-parte qua the assessee, after hearing the learned Departmental Representative and perusing the material available on record.

Having heard the learned Departmental Representative and having perused the material on record, we find that this appeal of the Revenue is no longer maintainable in view of the CBDT Circular No. 17 of 2019 dated 08.08.2019. The mandatory limit for cases in which Revenue can challenge the relief granted by the CIT(A) now stands enhanced to Rs.50 lakhs. This concession granted by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) is retrospective in effect inasmuch as it

It is, however, made clear that on re-verification at the end of the Assessing Officer if it comes out that the tax effect of more than Rs.50 lakhs is being involved in the appeal or the appeal falls within the exemption clause of the Circular, then the Revenue will be at liberty to file Miscellaneous Application to recall the Tribunal order. The application should be filed within the time limit prescribed in the Act.

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed due to low tax effect.