M/S CENTURY GALAXY DEVELOPERS LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-2(1)(1), BANGALORE
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of depreciation on buildings, following its own previous decisions in the assessee's own cases for earlier assessment years. The grounds raised by the assessee were dismissed.
What were the facts?
The assessee, engaged in apartment maintenance, claimed depreciation on buildings, which was disallowed by the Assessing Officer and upheld by the CIT(A). The assessee's income was assessed at a loss after this disallowance.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the allowability of depreciation on buildings claimed by the assessee. This issue was found to be covered by previous tribunal decisions in the assessee's own case.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH : BANGALORE
Before: SHRI JASON P BOAZ & SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE
Per Jason P Boaz, Accountant Member
This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of the CIT(A)-2, Bangalore dated 30.10.2018 for Assessment Year 2013-14.
Briefly stated, the facts of the case are as under:
2.1 The assessee, a company engaged in the business of maintenance of Apartments, filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2013-14 on 28.09.2013 declaring loss of Rs.(-) 6,15,62,779/-. The case was selected for scrutiny for this Assessment Year and the assessment was concluded under section 143(3) of the Page 2 of 4 Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’) vide order dated 24.03.2016 wherein the assessee’s income was assessed at (-)Rs.1,69,35,259/- in view of the disallowance of the assessee’s claim of depreciation on building amounting to Rs.4,46,27,520/-. On appeal, the CIT(A)-2, Bangalore, dismissed the assessee’s appeal vide order dated 30.10.2018.
3.1 Aggrieved by the order of CIT(A)-2, Bangalore, dated 30.10.2018 for Assessment Year 2013-14, the assessee filed this appeal wherein it has raised the following grounds:-
Page 3 of 4 3.2 The only issue raised in the grounds preferred in this appeal (supra), related to the disallowance of the assessee’s claim of depreciation on buildings. In the course of hearing the learned AR for the assessee fairly conceded that the issue for adjudication is squarely covered against the assessee by the decision of the Co-ordinate Bench of this Tribunal in the assessee’s own case for Assessment Year 2011-12 in dated 03.06.2016 (copy placed on record); by following the decision of Co-ordinate Bench in the assessee’s own case for Assessment Year 2003-04 in ITA No.999/Bang/2013. The learned AR submitted that the assessee has preferred appeals before the Hon’ble Karnataka High Court, against the aforesaid orders of the Tribunal (supra), which are pending disposal.
3.3.1 After having heard the rival submissions and perusal of the material on record, we find that the issue of the assessee’s claim of depreciation on buildings is squarely covered against the assessee by the decisions of the Co-ordinate Benches of this Tribunal in the assessee’s own case for Assessment Years 2011-12 and 2003-04. Respectfully following the decision of the Co-ordinate Bench of this Tribunal in the assessee’s own case for Assessment Year 2011-12 in dated 03.06.2016, we uphold the orders of the authorities below in disallowing the assessee’s claim of depreciation on buildings. Consequently, the grounds raised by assessee are dismissed.
In the result, the assessee’s appeal for Assessment Year 2013-14 is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open court on this 19th day of July, 2019.
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Sahoo Supply Agency,Balasore vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs,New DelhiOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S Jyoti Consultants, Agrahat vs. Pr. Commissioner GST And Central Excise Commissionerate, BhubaneswarOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S. Sahoo Supply Agency vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And CustomsOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- Gopal Aromatic PVT. LTD., Cuttack vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S Crs Builders Private Limited vs. Commissioner State Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 2 Nov 2026