Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A”
Before: SHRI MAHAVIR PRASAD, JM & SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, AM
Per S. Rifaur Rahman, Accountant Member:
The present Appeal has been filed by the revenue against the order of Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) - 53 in short referred as ‘Ld. CIT(A)’, Mumbai, dated 30.08.18 for Assessment Year (in short AY) 2009-10. 2 Atul Durlabhji Sonpal,
At the outset, we notice that the tax effect of the relief granted by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) is below Rs. 50 lacs and as per Circular No.17 of 2019 dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT), Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, the CBDT has revised the monetary limit for filing appeals before the ITAT from the existing limit of Rs. 20 lacs to Rs. 50 lacs.
The Ld. Departmental Representative (DR) fairly conceded that this appeal is not maintainable in light of the aforesaid circular issued by the CBDT. The Ld. DR also did not point out that this appeal falls in any of the exceptions carved out in the above said circular.
We have gone through the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and the grounds of appeals. We find that the tax effect in the above referred appeal is less than Rs. 50 lacs. Accordingly, we dismiss the aforesaid appeal filed by the Revenue as not maintainable/withdrawn.
3 Atul Durlabhji Sonpal,
In the net result, the appeal filed by the revenue stands dismissed. Order pronounced in the open court on 4th Nov, 2019. (Mahavir Prasad) (S. Rifaur Rahman) न्याययकसदस्य / Judicial Member लेखासदस्य / Accountant Member मुंबई Mumbai;यदनांक Dated : 04.11.2019 Sr.PS. Dhananjay
आदेशकीप्रनिनिनिअग्रेनर्ि/Copy of the Order forwarded to : अपीलाथी/ The Appellant 1. 2. प्रत्यथी/ The Respondent 3. आयकरआयुक्त(अपील) / The CIT(A) आयकरआयुक्त/ CIT- concerned 4. 5. यवभागीयप्रयतयनयि, आयकरअपीलीयअयिकरण, मुंबई/ DR, ITAT, Mumbai 6. गार्डफाईल / Guard File आदेशधिुसधर/ BY ORDER, .उि/सहधयकिंजीकधर (Dy./Asstt.