M/S LJ VICTORIA PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-4(1)(1), BANGALORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The ITAT set aside the CIT(A)'s order and remanded the matter back for a decision on merits. A cost of Rs. 5000 was levied on the assessee for non-appearance.
What were the facts?
The assessee failed to appear before the CIT(A) despite multiple notices, leading to an ex-parte order. The assessee also failed to provide a bona fide reason for their non-appearance before the ITAT.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) should have decided the appeal on merits instead of dismissing it ex-parte, and the consequences of the assessee's non-appearance before the lower appellate authority.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Multiplan India Ltd.2,267 citing38 ITD 320 · 1991 · ITAT
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, BANGALORE BENCHES : “B”, BANGALORE
Before: SHRI B.R.BASKARAN & SMT BEENA PILLAI, JUDICAL MEMBER
PER SMT BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER Present appeal has been filed by assessee against order dated 30/01/19 passed by Ld.CIT(A)-4, Bangalore for assessment year 2015-16. 2. At the outset, Ld.DR submitted that none appeared before Ld.CIT(A), and is an ex parte order. He also submitted that
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Utkal Suppliers,Ganjam vs. Assistant Commissioner Of CT And GST, Ganjam-I Circle,GanjamOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of Hte Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Dirtboot Holidays vs. The Commisssioner Central Goods And Service Tax, New Delhi & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026