Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Detected automatically from the text. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
Before: SHRI WASEEM AHMED&
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH, AHMEDABAD BEFORE SHRI WASEEM AHMED, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & Ms. MADHUMITA ROY, JUDICIAL MEMBER (Assessment Year: 2017-18) M/s. D. K. Trivedi & Sons Vs. The DCIT, D. K. Trivedi & Sons Premises, CPC, Kumbharia Road, Ta. Danta, Bengaluru Ambaji, Gujarat-385110 [PAN No.AABFD0992K] (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Appellant by : Shri Karan Shah, A.R. Respondent by : Shri C. S. Sharma, Sr. DR Date of Hearing 16.06.2022 Date of Pronouncement 22.06.2022 O R D E R PER Ms. MADHUMITA ROY - JM:
The instant appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 15.12.2021 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi arising out of the order dated 15.04.2019 passed by the DCIT, CPC, Bangalore under Section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) for A.Y. 2017-18.
We have heard the rival submissions made by the respective parties and we have also perused the relevant materials available on record. M/s. D. K. Trivedi & Sons vs. DCIT Asst.Year –2017-18 3. This matter relates to in confirming the addition on account of late payment of PF contribution of Rs. 6,71,290/- as made by the Ld. DCIT, CPC, Bengaluru.
At the time of hearing of the instant appeal the Ld. Counsel appearing for the assessee with all his fairness submitted that the issue involved in this particular matter relates to late payment of PF contribution has already been decided against the assessee by the Hon’ble Jurisdictional High Court in the case of CIT vs. GSRTC, reported in 366 ITR 170.
On the other hand, the Ld. DR relied upon the order passed by the authorities below.
Having heard the Ld. Counsels appearing for the parties, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case particularly taking into consideration the ratio laid down by the Hon’ble Jurisdictional High Court in the case of CIT vs. GSRTC (supra) we find no merit in the appeal preferred by the assessee. Hence, the same is dismissed.