ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. ART BEAUTY EXPORTS, NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the appeal had become infructuous as the underlying Section 263 order, which formed the basis of the assessment, was cancelled. Therefore, there was nothing left to decide in the appeal.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal was against an assessment order passed pursuant to a Section 263 order. The ITAT had previously cancelled the Section 263 order for the same assessment year. The assessee argued that the current appeal had become infructuous as its basis was removed.
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal against an assessment order based on a Section 263 order, which is subsequently cancelled, becomes infructuous.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: “G”, NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI BHAVNESH SAINI & SHRI O.P. KANT
ORDER PER O.P. KANT, A.M.: The present appeal is directed against the order of Ld. CIT(A)-18, New Delhi, dated 21.12.2015, for assessment year 2009-10. 2. During the course of hearing, the Ld. counsel for the assessee submitted that the impugned order in this case was passed against the assessment order which was made in pursuance to order under Section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘the Act’). It was submitted that the order passed 263 of the Act stood cancelled by ITAT vide order dated 30.11.2015 in for AY: 2009-10, copy of which is placed on record. Therefore, once the very basis of impugned assessment order stands collapsed, the present appeal should be rendered as infructuous. The Learned DR did not object to the above contention of the Ld. counsel for the assessee. In presence of these facts, we find nothing to decide this appeal, having become infructuous.
In the result, the appeal is dismissed, as indicated above.
Order is pronounced in the open court on 23rd January, 2019.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Mascot Constructions Co. And Another vs. The Commissioner Of Goods And Services Tax (GST) And AnotherBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Fasil Hussain Shah vs. Ut Of J And K Th Commissioner Secretary TO Government Finance Department And OthersJammu and Kashmir and Ladakh · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S. Devkinandan Traders vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Dixit Medical Agencies vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026