NABA KUMAR TAH,HOOGHLY vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-2, BURDWAN, BURDWAN
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The assessee sought to withdraw the appeal to settle the dispute under the 'Vivad Se Vishwas' Scheme. The Tribunal granted permission for withdrawal as the revenue had no objection.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal was against an order confirming an addition of Rs. 26,38,000/- made by the AO under Section 68. The addition was based on the AO treating long-term capital gains from share sales as bogus and unexplained cash credit.
What were the issues?
Whether the long-term capital gains from share sales were bogus and constituted unexplained cash credit. The primary issue became the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA BENCH ‘(SMC
Before: Shri P.M. Jagtap(KZ)]
order : July 06, 2020 ORDER This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of Ld. CIT(A) – Burdwan dated 07.12.2018 whereby he confirmed the addition of Rs. 26,38,000/- made by the AO u/s 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by holding the Long Term Capital Gain arising to the assessee from sale of shares as bogus and treating the proceeds of the said sale as unexplained cash credit.
The assessee in this case has made an application dated 29.06.2020 seeking permission of the Tribunal to withdraw this appeal on the ground that he is going to settle the dispute involved in this appeal under the ‘Vivad Se Vishwas’ Scheme 2020. Since the ld. DR has no objection in this regard, the permission as sought by the Assessment Year: 2015-16 Naba Kumar Tah assessee is granted and this appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed. Order Pronounced in the Open Court on 6th July, 2020.
More judgments on Section 68
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
- Bliss Dealtrade Private Limited, Kolkata vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 9(2) Kolkata…ITA 208/KOL/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-13
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dipanshu Aggarwal vs. Director General Of GST IntelligenceDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Dezinetree Projects PVT. LTD. vs. Spokes Digital Inc And AnrDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Jaydeep Jayantilal Hudaka vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 28 Oct 2026
- Commissioner/Additional Commissioner Of Central Tax vs. M/S INDIA Agro Exports Private LimitedKarnataka · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026