GOLAGANI SREENIVAS,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-5(1), VISAKHAPATNAM
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the sale deed was registered without proper payment of sale consideration to the vendor. The discrepancy in the dates of the cheques and the sale deed registration further indicated issues with the transaction. Consequently, the revenue authorities rightly concluded that the assessee made the investment through unexplained sources.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) concerning Assessment Year 2016-17. The case was selected for limited scrutiny due to a large investment in property compared to total income. The assessee acquired an immovable property for Rs. 1,57,32,000/- and claimed a hand loan of Rs. 1,20,00,000/- for the payment.
What were the issues?
Whether the addition made by the Assessing Officer under section 69 of the Act for unexplained investment in the purchase of immovable property is justified.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, VISAKHAPATNAM “DIVISION” BENCH, VISAKHAPATNAM
Before: SHRI LALIET KUMAR, HON’BLE & SHRI S BALAKRISHNAN, HON’BLE
आदेशकीप्रनतनलनपअग्रेनर्त/ Copy of the order forwarded to:-
1. 1. निर्धाररती/ The Assessee : Golagani Sreenivas D.No. 18-97 Old Diary Farm, Pedagadili Visakhapatnam – 530040 Andhra Pradesh 2. रधजस्व/ The Revenue : Income Tax Officer – Ward-5(1) Income Tax office Direct Taxes Building MVP Colony Visakhapatnam – 530017 Andhra Pradesh 3. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax नवभधगीयप्रनतनिनर्, आयकरअपीलीयअनर्करण, नवशधखधपटणम /DR,ITAT, Visakhapatnam 4.
5. The Commissioner of Income Tax 6. गधर्ाफ़धईल / Guard file //True Copy// आदेशधिुसधर / BY ORDER
Sr. Private Secretary ITAT, Visakhapatnam
Page. No 6
More judgments on Section 69
- Azure Knowledge Corporation Private… vs The Dy.CIT, Circle-1(1)(1), AhmedabadITA 2013/AHD/2024[2018-19]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Naresh Chandra Khattar, Agra vs ITO Ward-1(1)(2), AgraITA 475/AGR/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Ranchhodbhai Kurjibhai Kakadiya, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1)(1), RajkotITA 553/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Gorantla Rahul Kumar, Visakhapatnam vs The Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 670/VIZ/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Gorantla Rahul Kumar, Visakhapatnam vs The Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 669/VIZ/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Gr Infra Projects Limited Ratlam Through Its Authorized Signatory Mr. Pankaj Das vs. The State Of Madhya PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary Dept. Of Revenue Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages PVT. LTD. vs. The Commissioner, CGST And Cx, Dibrugarh And AnrGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shree Sushruta Health Services Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Rst Batteries vs. Deputy Commissioner CGST Delhi West & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026