ITO 17(1)(3), MUMBAI vs. SHRI CHETAN BACHUBHAI DOSHI, MUMBAI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to sustain 8% disallowance on bogus purchases. It reasoned that when sales are not doubted, 100% disallowance is not justified, and 8% strikes a balance given the circumstances of grey market purchases.
What were the facts?
The Revenue is aggrieved by the CIT(A)'s decision to sustain only 8% disallowance on account of bogus purchases, instead of the Assessing Officer's 12.5%. The assessee, a trader in ball bearing and hardware, was investigated for purchases from bogus dealers.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the extent of disallowance for bogus purchases when the assessee's sales were not doubted. The Tribunal also considered the implications of purchases made through the grey market.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” Bench, Mumbai
Before: Shri Mahavir Singh (JM) & Shri Shamim Yahya (AM)
This appeal by the Revenue wherein the Revenue is aggrieved that learned CIT(A) has sustained only 8% as against 12.5% disallowance by the Assessing Officer on account of bogus purchases, vide order dated 15.6.2018 pertaining to AY 2010-11.
The assessee in this case is engaged into business of traders in ball bearing and hardware. The assessment was reopened upon information from sales tax department that assessee has made purchases from bogus dealers. The assessing officer in this case has made 12.5% addition on account of bogus purchase amounting to Rs. 10,77,771/-.
Upon assessee's appeal learned CIT-A has noted that the sale has not been doubted. Accordingly placing reliance upon several case laws and up on the facts of the case he sustained 8% disallowance out of the bogus purchases.
Against above order revenue is in appeal before the ITAT. We have heard learned Departmental Representative and perused the records. We find that in 2 Shri Chetan Bachubhai Doshi this case the sales have not been doubted it is settled law that when sales are not doubted, hundred percent disallowance for bogus purchase cannot be done. The rationale being no sales is possible without actual purchases. This proposition is supported from honourable jurisdictional High Court decision in the case of Nikunj Eximp Enterprises (in writ petition no 2860, order dt. 18.6.2014). In this case the Honourable High Court has upheld hundred percent allowance for the purchases said to be bogus when sales are not doubted. However the facts of the present case indicate that assessee has made purchase from the grey market. Making purchases through the grey market gives the assessee savings on account of non-payment of tax and others at the expense of the exchequer. In such situation in our considered opinion on the facts and circumstances of the case the 8% disallowance out of the bogus purchases done by the learned CIT-A meets the end of justice. Accordingly, we uphold the order of learned CIT-A.
In the result this appeal filed by the Revenue stands dismissed. Order has been pronounced in the Court on 3.12.2019.
More judgments on Section 68
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
- Bliss Dealtrade Private Limited, Kolkata vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 9(2) Kolkata…ITA 208/KOL/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-13
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Ashish Enterprises vs. Assistant Commissioner Gsto Ward No. 86Delhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bhanwal Trading And Company vs. The Union Of INDIARajasthan · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Saraswati Enterprises vs. State Of RajasthanRajasthan · 28 Oct 2026
- Akshaya Consortium vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Dipanshu Aggarwal vs. Director General Of GST IntelligenceDelhi · 28 Oct 2026