PRABHAKARAN MANGAT,KERALA vs. THE PR. CIT-3, AHMEDABAD
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal allowed the withdrawal of the appeal. The assessee had already received relief from the Assessing Officer on the issue raised by the PCIT.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order passed by the PCIT under Section 263. During the hearing, the assessee sought to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal filed by the assessee should be withdrawn as the issue has been resolved by the Assessing Officer.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
Before: SHRI P.M. JAGTAP, VICE- & SMT. SUCHITRA R. KAMBLE
PER P.M. JAGTAP, VICE-PRESIDENT :
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of the learned Principal Commissioner of Income-tax, Ahmedabad-3 (“PCIT” in short) dated 31.03.2021 passed under Section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (“the Act” in short).
At the time of hearing fixed in this case on 07.07.2022, it is noticed that the learned Counsel for the assessee has filed a letter dated 6th July, 2022 seeking permission to withdraw the appeal on the ground that the assessee has already been granted relief, vide an assessment order dated 30.03.2022 passed by the Assessing Officer under Section 263 r.w.s. 143(3) of the Act, on the issue taken by the PCIT under the revisional proceedings. The Prabhakaran Mangat Vs. PCIT AY : 2015-16 2 assessee, therefore, pleaded that the appeal filed by the assessee may be dismissed as withdrawn. The learned Departmental Representative has no objection to the withdrawal of the appeal filed by the assessee. In view of these facts, we allow the withdrawal of the appeal filed by the assessee; and, accordingly appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced in the open Court on 7th July, 2022 at Ahmedabad.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- The State Of Bihar Through The Commissioner Of State Tax vs. Kaushlendra KumarPatna · 27 Oct 2026
- Ayush Sureshchandra Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- Sureshchandra Moolchand Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Larsen And Toubro Limited vs. Joint Commissioner Of Central GST And Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- T C Global INDIA Private Limited vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central GST, North DelhiDelhi · 27 Oct 2026