PAWAN KUMAR AGARWAL,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE- 72(1), NEW DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 3367/DEL/2018Status: DisposedITAT Delhi05 February 2019AY 2009-103 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal restored the issue to the Assessing Officer (AO) for verification. The AO was directed to allow the TDS credit if satisfied with the documents produced by the assessee.

What were the facts?

The assessee claimed credit for TDS of Rs. 1,21,968/- which was not appearing in their Form 26AS. The deductor had allegedly mentioned a wrong PAN in the TDS return, leading to the discrepancy.

What were the issues?

Whether the assessee is entitled to credit for TDS which is not reflected in Form 26AS due to a wrong PAN being reported by the deductor.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 154

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘SMC’, NEW DELHI

Before: Sh. N. S. Saini

Hearing: 04.02.2019Pronounced: 05.02.2019

ORDER This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of CIT(A)-21, New Delhi dated 13.03.2018.

2.

The sole issue involved in this appeal is that the CIT(A) erred in not allowing credit for TDS of Rs.1,21,968/- which was deducted from the assessee but is not appearing in 26AS.

3.

Before the CIT(A), the assessee filed order u/s 154 of the Act which was dated 09.08.2016 wherein TDS credit of Rs.2,35,063/- was given to the appellant. The CIT(A) observed that from submission of the appellant, it appears that deductor has mentioned wrong PAN in the TDS return and hence balance claim of Rs.1,21,968/- was not appearing in 26AS. This defect has to be rectified by the deductor. Unless, this is done, credit 2 Pawan Kumar Agarwal of tax cannot be given to the correct deductee as credit might have gone to the wrong PAN holder in whose name this TDS has been shown by the deductor. Therefore, he held that there was no infirmity in the order passed u/s 154 of the Act in allowing credit for TDS against which PAN of the assessee has been shown by the deductor.

4.

Before me, the AR of the assessee has filed copy of Form No. 26AS which is placed at page no. 25 of the paper book. The assessee has also filed copy of screen shot taken from Income Tax website and ITD system showing wrong PAN AAEPP1658G mentioned in TDS return by employer not in existence placed at page nos. 26 & 27 of the paper book. He has also filed communication from employer placed at page nos. 28 to 33 of the paper book. The assessee has also filed copy of CBDT Instruction no. 275/29/2014-IT-(B) placed at page no. 60 of the paper book. From these documents, the assessee submitted that the AO may be directed to allow credit of balance amount of TDS of Rs.1,21,968/- to the assessee.

5.

The ld. DR had no objection to restore the matter to the file of the AO for allowing the credit for TDS to the assessee after verification.

6.

In the above facts and circumstances of the case, I restore the issue to the file of the AO for verification of TDS allowable to the assessee from the documents to be furnished by the assessee before him. If he is satisfied with the verification of the documents to be produced by the assessee then he shall allow credit for balance amount of TDS of Rs.1,21,968/- as claimed by the assessee. With these directions, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.

7.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. (Order Pronounced in the Open Court on 05/02/2019).

More judgments on Section 154

All 8,676 judgments and leading authorities on Section 154 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →