APPALA PARADESI CHARITABLE TRUST,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION), VISAKHAPATNAM

PDF · subscribers
ITA 3/VIZ/2025Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam07 March 2025Bench: SHRI K.NARASIMHA CHARY (Judicial Member), SHRI BALAKRISHNAN S (Accountant Member)3 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal found that the assessee had provided sufficient evidence of charitable activities, including ITR acknowledgements, audit reports, financials, and trust deeds. The CIT(E) had not specified which activities were not charitable.

What were the facts?

The assessee, Appala Paradesi Charitable Trust, applied for registration under Section 80G of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(E) rejected the application, stating that the trust was not carrying out substantial charitable activities.

What were the issues?

Whether the rejection of the Section 80G registration application by the CIT(E) was justified without specifying non-charitable activities. Whether the assessee's activities were genuinely charitable in nature.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 80G,Section 10(23C),Section 12A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, VISAKHAPATNAM BENCH, VISAKHAPATNAM

Before: SHRI K.NARASIMHA CHARY & SHRI BALAKRISHNAN S

Hearing: 03/03/2025

सुिवधई की तधरीख/Date of hearing: 03/03/2025 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Pronouncement on: 07/03/2025 आदेश / ORDER PER K. NARASIMHA CHARY, J.M: Aggrieved by the order dated 11/12/2024 passed by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), (“learned CIT(E)”), Hyderabad in the case of Appala Paradesi Charitable Trust (“the assessee”), assessee preferred this appeal.

2.

At the outset, learned AR submitted that the learned CIT (E) rejected the application of the assessee in form No.10AB seeking registration under section 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short “the Act”) stating that no substantial activities which are charitable in nature are being carried out by the assessee, which is in violation of the provisions of the sec. 80G of the Act, without specifying any details thereof. The learned AR brought to our notice the ITR acknowledgements for the assessment years 2022-23, 2023-24 and 2024-25, independent audit report for the assessment year 2024-25, computation of income along with the financials and form 10AB for the assessment years 2022-23 and 2023-24, copy of Trust Deed dated 12/12/2018 and the photographs evidencing the activities of the assessee. Without pointing out which activity of the assessee does not fall in the category of charitable activities, the learned CIT(A) is not justified in rejecting the application for registration in section 80G of the Act.

3.

Learned DR placing to heavy reliance on the impugned order and submitted that the learned CIT(E) took a plausible view on a perusal of the submissions made by the assessee that the assessee did not do any considerable activity of charitable in nature.

4.

We have gone through the record in the light of the submissions made on either side. It is an undisputed fact that by order dated 13/5/2022, registration under section 12A of the Act was granted under clause (23C) of section 10 of the Act, subject to the condition that if it is subsequently found that the activities of the assessee are not genuine or if they are not carried out in accordance with all or any of the conditions subject to which such registration was granted. There is no complaint against the assessee for violating any of the conditions mentioned in this registration.

5.

The ITR acknowledgements for the assessment years 2022-23, 2023-24 and 2024-25, independent audit report for the assessment year 2024-25, computation of income along with the financials and form 10AB for the assessment years 2022-23 and 2023-24, copy of Trust Deed dated 12/12/2018 and the photographs evidencing the activities of the assessee establish that the assessee did considerable activities during the year. When these things are viewed in the light of the activities mentioned in the trust deed dated 12/12/2018 and the photographs showing the welfare measures taken for production and conservation of the cows show that these activities are charitable in nature. Ld. CIT (E) did not specify any activity that does not fall in the category of charitable activity.

6.

In the circumstances, we are of the considered opinion that it is a fit case to set aside the impugned order and restore the issue to the file of the learned CIT(E) with a direction to reconsider the issue in the light of the material and grant registration under section 80G of the act. Grounds are answered accordingly.

7.

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed.

Order pronounced in the Open Court on 7th March, 2025.

More judgments on Section 80G

All 6,482 judgments and leading authorities on Section 80G →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →