ROYAL DEEDS CHARITABLE TRUST,VIJAYAWADA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), HYDERABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the Ld. CIT (Exemption) rejected the application without properly specifying what constituted commercial activities and without due consideration of the documents submitted by the assessee. Therefore, the matter was remitted back to the Ld. CIT (Exemption) to re-examine the documents and submissions, and decide on the Section 80G registration after providing a reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee.
What were the facts?
Royal Deeds Charitable Trust applied for registration under Section 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961, by filing Form-10AB. The Ld. CIT (Exemption) issued notices seeking documents and details, and despite submissions from the assessee, rejected the application on the grounds that the Trust's activities were commercial in nature and violated provisions of Section 12AB and 80G.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT (Exemption) was justified in rejecting the assessee's Section 80G registration application without specifying commercial activities or considering submitted documents, and whether the rejection violated principles of natural justice.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, VISAKHAPATNAM BENCH, VISAKHAPATNAM
Before: SHRI K NARASIMHA CHARY, HON’BLE & SHRI S BALAKRISHNAN, HON’BLE
आदेश की प्रनतनलनप अग्रेनर्त /Copy of the order forwarded to:- ननधधाऩरती/ The Assessee – Royal Deeds Charitable Trust, 20-6-3/21, 1. Appala Raju Street, Ayodhya Nagar, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh- 520003. रधजस्व/The Revenue – Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), 2. Aayakar Bhawan, Opposite LB Stadium Basheer Bagh, Hyderabad, Telangana – 500004. 3. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, आयकर आयुक्त (अपील)/ The Commissioner of Income Tax 4. नवभधगीय प्रनतनननध, आयकर अपीलीय अनधकरण, नवशधखधपटणम/ DR, ITAT, 5. Visakhapatnam गधर्ा फ़धईल / Guard file 6.
आदेशधनुसधर / BY ORDER
Sr. Private Secretary ITAT, Visakhapatnam
More judgments on Section 80G
- Savan Dayalal Ladani, Rajkot vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax-2(1)…ITA 575/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Pareshbhai Savjibhai Khunt, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer Ward - 2(2)(3), RajkotITA 842/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S.Sidhivinayak Roadways, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise, Rourkela Commissionerate, RourkelaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Kalinga Paper Mart, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Kabita Nayak vs. Chief Commissioner, CGST, Central Excise And Customs, KhurdaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Swastika Ingot PVT.LTD, Sundargarh vs. The Addl Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026