JAGDISH SINGH,NOIDA vs. ITO, WARD- 3(4), NOIDA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal restored the issue to the CIT(A) to grant one final opportunity to the assessee to present their case. The assessee is directed to appear without adjournment.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal before the CIT(A) was dismissed ex parte due to non-appearance. The assessment was completed under Section 144/147 of the IT Act.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) was justified in dismissing the appeal ex parte without considering the merits, and whether the assessee should be granted a final opportunity to be heard.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH : SMC : NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI R.K. PANDA
ORDER This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order dated 31st March, 2017 of the CIT(A)-1, Noida, relating to Assessment Year 2009-10.
The assessee in the grounds of appeal has challenged the ex parte order of the CIT(A) in dismissing the appeal filed by the assessee for non-appearance.
3. After hearing the ld. DR and on perusal of the orders of the authorities below, I find the assessment in this case was completed u/s 144/147 of the IT Act on 22.11.2016 determining the total income at Rs.21,51,600/-. Since none appeared on behalf of the assessee, the ld.CIT(A), in the ex parte order passed by him, dismissed the appeal filed by the assessee. However, he has not passed the order on merit. Considering the totality of the facts of the case and in the interest of justice, I deem it proper to restore this issue back to the file of the CIT (A) with a direction to grant one final opportunity to the assessee to substantiate his case. The assessee is also hereby directed to appear before the CIT(A) and substantiate his case without seeking any adjournment under any pretext failing which the ld.CIT(A) is at liberty to pass appropriate order as per law. I hold and direct accordingly. The grounds raised by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. The decision was pronounced in the open court on 20.02.2019.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Sahoo Supply Agency,Balasore vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs,New DelhiOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S Jyoti Consultants, Agrahat vs. Pr. Commissioner GST And Central Excise Commissionerate, BhubaneswarOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S. Sahoo Supply Agency vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And CustomsOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- Gopal Aromatic PVT. LTD., Cuttack vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S Crs Builders Private Limited vs. Commissioner State Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 2 Nov 2026