Facts
The Assessing Officer initiated re-assessment proceedings against ASR Educational Society for A.Y. 2013-14 for not accounting for bank interest, accepting nil income claiming Section 11 exemption. The Pr. CIT later observed a shortfall in the application of funds, issued a Show Cause Notice under Section 263 to revise the assessment, and passed an order the very next day. The assessee appealed, citing a 1016-day delay due to a technical error by their tax consultant and arguing that the SCN was served on the due date itself, denying adequate opportunity to respond.
Held
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal, accepting it as a bona fide mistake by the tax consultant. On merits, the Tribunal quashed the Pr. CIT's order under Section 263, ruling that the assessee was not given sufficient opportunity to respond to the Show Cause Notice, which violated principles of natural justice (*audi alteram partem*). Consequently, the original assessment order passed by the A.O. under Section 143(3) read with Section 147 was restored.
Key Issues
1. Whether the significant delay in filing the appeal should be condoned. 2. Whether the Pr. CIT's order under Section 263 was valid, given the alleged lack of proper notice and opportunity for the assessee to be heard before the revision.
Sections Cited
263, 147, 148, 143(3), 11
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Visakhapatnam Bench
आदेशकी प्रतततिति अग्रेतषत/ Copy of the order forwarded to:- 1. तिर्ााररती/The Assessee : ASR Educational Society, 6-41, By Pass Road, Pydiparru, Tanuku, Andhra Pradesh – 534211. 2. राजस्व/ The Revenue : The Income Tax Officer (Exemptions), Rajahmundry. 3. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Hyderabad. 4. तवभागीयप्रतततितर्, आयकर अिीिीय अतर्करण, / DR, ITAT, Visakhapatnam. 5. गार्ाफ़ाईि / Guard file
आदेशािुसार / BY ORDER
Sr. Private Secretary ITAT, Visakhapatnam