DIVYASRI REALTERS,HYDERABAD vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, VIJAYAWADA
Facts
The assessee, Divyasri Realters, filed an appeal against an order passed by the Pr. CIT under Section 143(3) for AY 2017-18, but with a significant delay of 366 days. A notarized affidavit was submitted explaining the delay, citing a bona fide impression regarding the nature of a Pr.CIT direction under Section 263 and the time taken for legal advice.
Held
The Tribunal determined that the reasons provided by the assessee for the delay of 366 days did not constitute 'reasonable and sufficient cause' as required by Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963. Consequently, the plea for condonation of delay was rejected, and the appeal was dismissed as not maintainable.
Key Issues
Whether the assessee had a 'reasonable and sufficient cause' to condone the 366-day delay in filing the appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.
Sections Cited
143(3), 263, 5 (Limitation Act, 1963)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, VISAKHAPATNAM BENCH, VISAKHAPATNAM
आदेशकीप्रनतनलनपअग्रेनर्त/ Copy of the order forwarded to:- 1. निर्धाररती/The Assessee : Divyasri Realters, 2-1-265/1/35, Road No.3A, Mamata Nagar, Nagole, Hyderabad, Telangana-500035. 2. रधजस्व/ The Revenue : Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Revenue Colony, Siddhartha Public School Road, Mogalrajapuram, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh-520010. 3. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, नवभधगीयप्रनतनिनर्, आयकरअपीलीयअनर्करण /DR,ITAT, Visakhapatnam. 4. 5. The Commissioner of Income Tax 6. गधर्ाफ़धईल / Guard file
आदेशधिुसधर / BY ORDER
Sr. Private Secretary ITAT, Visakhapatnam