ANANDA AQUA EXPORTS,GANAPAVARAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, BHIMAVARM
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the CIT(A) dismissed the appeal ex-parte without granting a reasonable opportunity. The Tribunal decided to hear the case on legal grounds, including the validity of the notice and limitation.
What were the facts?
The assessee declared a loss, but the AO noted significant cash deposits during demonetization and a discrepancy between bank credits and declared turnover. The AO added a sum representing unexplained cash deposits.
What were the issues?
The key issues are the validity of the reassessment notice due to limitation and the CIT(A)'s ex-parte dismissal of the appeal without providing a proper opportunity to the assessee.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 143(3),Section 147,Section 148,Section 148A,Section 69A,Section 115BBE,Section 250,Section 149(1)(b)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
I.T.A.No.15/VIZ/2025 Ananda Aqua Exports -- AY.2017-18 arising out of order passed under section 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘Act') dated 23.05.2023. 2. Brief facts of the case are that, assessee filed its return of income declaring a loss of Rs.2,22,563/-. The case was selected for scrutiny, for the reason, that the assessee has made cash deposits amounting to Rs.69,43,000/- during the demonetization period into the bank account of the assessee. Further, it was also observed that the total credits in the bank account is Rs.7,94,44,149/- whereas turnover declared by the assessee is Rs.5,59,44,879/-. Initially notice under section 148 of the Act was issued under un-amended provisions of the Act on 30.06.2021. Consequent to the directions of the CBDT vide Instruction 1/2022 dated 11.05.2022, notice issued under section 148 of the Act dated 30.06.2021 was deemed to be considered as show-cause notice under section 148A(b) of the amended Act. Considering the reply of the assessee dated 15.06.2022 order under section 148A(d) was passed on 26.07.2022 and notice under section 148 was issued on 26.07.2022. On a perusal of the submissions made by the assessee during t
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Giri Paints vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026
- Rahul Radheshyam Chauhan vs. Union Of INDIA Thru The Sec. Ministry Of Law And Justice And OrsBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- S.Murugesan vs. The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Annai Garden vs. The Commercial Tax Officer / The State Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Yadeshwar Mallekedi vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 15 Oct 2026