M/S SRI SOMESHWARA DEVELOPERS & BUILDERS,MYSORE vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1(2), MYSORE
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal set aside the order of the CIT(Appeals) and restored the appeal to the CIT(Appeals) for adjudication on merits. The assessee was granted an opportunity to submit the demand notice and substantiate their case.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal before the CIT(Appeals) was dismissed as defective due to non-submission of the original demand notice. The assessee argued that there was no mandatory requirement to file the demand notice electronically at the time of appeal filing.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(Appeals) was justified in dismissing the appeal as defective for non-submission of the original demand notice, and whether the assessee should be granted an opportunity to present their case on merits.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, BANGALORE BENCHES “ A ” BENCH: BANGALORE
Before: SHRI A.K. GARODIA & SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE
O R D E R
PER SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE, JM :
The assessee has filed an appeal against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Mysore passed u/s. 143(3) and u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
At the time of hearing, the learned Authorised Representative submitted that the CIT (Appeals) has dismissed the appeal as defective and unadmitted. Hence the learned Authorised Representative prayed for an opportunity before the CIT (Appeals) to substantiate the case with evidences. Whereas the learned Departmental Representative supported the orders of CIT (Appeals).
We heard the rival submissions and perused the material on record. We found that there is no representation by the assessee or by Authorised Representative in the appellate proceedings against the order of Assessing Officer under Section 143(3) of the Act Dt.29.12.2017. The assessee has filed an appeal with the CIT (Appeals) but due to non-submission of original demand notice, the deficiency was intimated to assessee by the CIT (Appeals) office through letter dt.20.04.2018. Since there was no response and no communication was received, ;the CIT (Appeals) has considered the appeal as defective and not admitted and dismissed. The learned Authorised Representative submitted tha the assessee has filed Form No.35 electronically and there is no provision to file original demand notice electronically. The learned Authorised Representative further submitted that under the provisions of Section 45 of I.T. Rules, there is no mandatory requirement at the time of filing the appeal to submit the demand notice and that the assessee has a good case on merits and prayed for an opportunity to submit the original demand notice and substantiated the case on merits in appellate proceedings. The ld. DR has no serious objection. Accordingly, to meet the ends of justice, we set aside the order of CIT (Appeals) and restore the entire disputed issue to the file of CIT (Appeals) to adjudicate afresh on merits and further the assessee should also be provided adequate opportunity of hearing and shall co-operate in submitting the information for early disposal of the appeal and allow the appeal of the assessee for statistical purposes.
More judgments on Section 45
- Mukesh Mishra, Thane vs ACIT, Circle 1, ThaneITA 5853/MUM/2026[2020-2021]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2020-2021
- Sip Infotech Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 5355/MUM/2026[2019-2020]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2019-2020
- Rajiv Kumar, Delhi vs DCIT, Circle 67(1), DelhiITA 3538/DEL/2026[2011-12]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2011-12
- DCIT 19 1 Mumbai, Mumbai vs Nisha Jhaveri, MumbaiITA 2389/MUM/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2013-14
- Arokiaswamy Velumani, Bengaluru vs Income Tax Officer 15(3)(1), MumbaiITA 1946/MUM/2026[2023-2024]Status: Disposed24 Sept 2026AY 2023-2024
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Akshaya Consortium vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Dipanshu Aggarwal vs. Director General Of GST IntelligenceDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Dezinetree Projects PVT. LTD. vs. Spokes Digital Inc And AnrDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Jaydeep Jayantilal Hudaka vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 28 Oct 2026
- Commissioner/Additional Commissioner Of Central Tax vs. M/S INDIA Agro Exports Private LimitedKarnataka · 28 Oct 2026