AMAR PAL,GHAZIABAD vs. ITO, WARD-1(5), GHAZIABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal granted the assessee one more opportunity to present their appeal before the CIT(A) by imposing a cost of Rs. 5000/-. The CIT(A) was directed to adjudicate the appeal afresh after providing a proper opportunity of hearing.
What were the facts?
The assessee failed to appear before the Assessing Officer and the CIT(A), leading to the dismissal of their appeal. The assessee's representative sought one more opportunity before the CIT(A) without providing a valid explanation for non-cooperation.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee should be granted another opportunity to present their case before the appellate authority despite prior non-cooperation, and if so, under what conditions.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘SMC’, NEW DELHI
Before: Sh. N. S. Saini
ORDER This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Ghaziabad dated 28.09.2018.
2. It is observed from the order of assessment that the Assessing Officer passed order u/s 144 r.w.s. 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on 23.11.2017 as the assessee did not appear before him and filed the details required by the Assessing Officer.
Further, it is observed from the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) that notice of hearing was given on following dates when the following was the outcome: Sl. No. Date of Date fixed Remark notice for hearing 1. 13.08.2018 21.08.2018 An application filed for (by Speed adjournment. On request the Post and case is adjourned to Email) 30.08.2018.
30.08.2018 An application filed for adjournment. On request the case is adjourned to 11.09.2018. 3. 11.09.2018 An application filed for adjournment. On request the case is adjourned to 18.09.2018. 3. 18.09.2018 An application filed for adjournment. On request the case is adjourned to 26.09.2018. With final opportunity. 4. 26.09.2018 None attended. 4. In the above circumstances, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) dismissed the appeal of the assessee.
Before me, the Authorized Representative of the assessee prayed that one more opportunity should be granted to the assessee to present its appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). However, he could not explain the reasons for not cooperating with the Assessing Officer and the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) by appearing on the dates of hearing fixed by them.
The ld. Departmental Representative vehemently opposed the prayer of the Authorized Representative of the assessee for allowing one more opportunity to the assessee for presenting its appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals).
I have considered the rival submissions and perused the orders of the lower authorities and materials available on record. It is an undisputed fact of the case that the assessee did not cooperate with the Assessing Officer as well as the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) during the dates of hearing fixed by them by filing the requisite details and evidences. However, I am of the opinion that to render substantial justice in the case one more opportunity should be granted to the assessee but with imposition of cost. I, therefore, direct the assessee to deposit Rs.5000/- as cost and restore the appeal to the file of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for adjudicating the same afresh after allowing reasonable and proper opportunity of hearing to the assessee. The assessee is directed to produce the challan for deposit of cost of Rs.5000/- before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and also file a copy of the same to the Tribunal. With these directions, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. (Order pronounced in the Court on 29 t h day of April, 2019 at New Delhi)
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Abd Maestro Private Limited vs. Great Galleon Ventures LTDDelhi · 3 Nov 2026
- Jangeer Singh Trading As Jangeer Singh Kabulshah Agriculture Works vs. Yogesh Jangid Trading As Jangid Agro Engineering & Anr.Delhi · 3 Nov 2026
- Rabindranath Behera vs. The Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, OdishaOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- Dinesh Dash vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S.Ishwar Chandra Barik, Keonjhar vs. Commissioner(Appeal), GST, Central Excise And Customs, BhubaneswarOrissa · 3 Nov 2026