M/S. THE MALLESHWARAM ASSOCIATION,BANGALORE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE- 2(2)(1), BANGALORE

PDF · subscribers
ITA 2005/BANG/2019Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore27 November 2019AY 2016-174 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that there is no provision in the Income Tax Act to allow set off of losses from exempt income against taxable income. The alternative claim for adhoc deduction of expenses against interest income was also rejected due to lack of evidence.

What were the facts?

The assessee, a mutual association, claimed set off of losses from club activities against rental and interest income. The Assessing Officer and CIT(A) rejected this claim, stating that income from club activities is exempt under the principle of mutuality.

What were the issues?

Whether losses from activities exempt under the principle of mutuality can be set off against taxable rental and interest income. Whether adhoc deduction for expenses incurred in earning interest income can be allowed.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

N/A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SMC, “A’’ BENCH : BANGALORE

Before: SHRI B.R BASKARAN

For Appellant: Shri Sandeep, C.A
For Respondent: Shri Ganesh R Ghale, Advocate Standing Counsel to Dept
Hearing: 27.11.2019

O R D E R Per B.R Baskaran, Accountant Member The assessee has filed this appeal challenging the order dated 03-06-2019 passed by Ld CIT(A)-2, Bengaluru and it relates to the assessment year 2016-17. All the grounds urged by the assessee relate to the rejection of claim of the assessee for set off of loss arising from club activities against rental and interest income.

2.

The assessee is a mutual association providing various facilities to its members. The income arising from such activities are claimed as exempt under the Principles of Mutuality. The assessee has also derived rental income and interest income. During the year under consideration, it filed its return of income declaring income of Rs.46.53 lakhs, admittedlyconsisting of rental and interest income. Subsequently, it revised its return, wherein the total income was declared at Rs.447/-. In the revised return of income, the assessee had set off the loss arising from club activities against the rental & interest income. Since income arising from club activities is exempt under the Principles of Mutuality, the AO rejected the claim of set off of loss arising from club activities. The Ld CIT(A) also confirmed the same.

3.

The Ld A.R submitted that the assessee has duly offered the rental income and interest income for taxation, as the Principles of Mutuality would not apply to the same. He submitted that the deposits were made and the building was constructed by using funds collected from the members only. Since the club activities resulted in loss and since the funds contributed by the members were only used to construct building and make fixed deposits, the assessee has sought deduction of above said loss against the rental & interest income. The Ld A.R submitted that, if the assessee’s claim is rejected by the Tribunal, then adhoc deduction towards expenses may be given against interest income, since the part of establishment expenses could be attributed to interest income also.

4.

The Ld D.R, on the contrary, submitted that there is no provision under the Act to allow set off of loss arising from club activities (income of which is exempt under Principle of Mutuality) against income taxable under the Act. With regard to alternative contention for adhoc deduction of expenses incurred for earning interest income, the Ld D.R submitted that the assessee has failed to show that it has incurred any expenditure in earning the interest income.

5.

I heard the parties and perused the record. I agree with the submission of Ld D.R that there is no provision under the Act to allow set off of loss arising from club activities (income of which is exempt under Principle of Mutuality) against income taxable under the Act. Hence I am of the view that the tax authorities are right in law in rejecting the claim of the assessee. With regard to alternative claim of the assessee also, I agree with the submission of Ld D.R that the assessee has failed to show that it has incurred any expenditure in earning interest income. Accordingly the alternative contention of the Ld A.R is also rejected.

6.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed.

Order pronounced in the open court on 27th November, 2019.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →