PHILIPS INDIA LIMITED (EARLIER KNOWN AS PHILIPS ELECTRONICS INDIA LIMITED),KOLKATA vs. PRINCIPAL CIT - 4, KOLKATA, KOLKATA
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the Assessing Officer made no additions in the consequential order. Therefore, the assessee withdrew the appeal as it was considered an academic exercise.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order passed by the Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act. The Assessing Officer, in the consequential order, made no additions to the assessee's income.
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal against a Section 263 order is maintainable when the consequential assessment order results in no additions.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA ‘A’ BENCH, KOLKATA
Before: Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy, Hon’ble & Sri S.S. Godara, Hon’ble
order : October 22nd, 2020 ORDER Per J. Sudhakar Reddy, AM :- This appeals filed by the assessee is directed against the order of the Learned Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax – 4, Kolkata, (hereinafter the “ld.CIT(A)”), passed u/s. 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the ‘Act’), dt. 26/03/2018, for the Assessment Year 2011-12.
The ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that the Assessing Officer, in the consequential order passed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 263 of the Act, has not made any addition/s and the assessee, under such circumstances, chooses to withdraw the appeal as it would be an academic exercise. The ld. D/R raised no objection. Accordingly, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed.
Kolkata, the 22nd day of October, 2020. Sd/- Sd/- [J. Sudhakar Reddy] [S. S. Godara] Judicial Member Accountant Member Dated : 22.10.2020 {SC SPS}
Assessment Year: 2011-12 Philips India Limited Copy of the order forwarded to: 1. Philips India Limited [Earlier known as Philips Electronics India Limited] [Earlier known as Philips Electronics India Limited] 3rd Floor Tower-A, DLF IT Park 08 Block AF, Major Arterial Road Block AF, Major Arterial Road New Town (Rajarhat) Kolkata – 700 156
2. Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -4, Kolkata 3. CIT(A)- 4. CIT- , 5. CIT(DR), Kolkata Benches, Kolkata. 5. CIT(DR), Kolkata Benches, Kolkata.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Rohit Medical Systems vs. Commissioner Of Delhi Goods And Services Tax And Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Shivam Kumar vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Rajkalpana Travels PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner CGST, Delhi North CommissionerateDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026