SRI.K.N.SREEKUMAR,KOTTAYAM vs. THE ACIT, KOTTAYAM

PDF
ITA 108/COCH/2021Status: DisposedITAT Cochin22 January 2025AY 2006-07Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao (Accountant Member), Shri Prakash Chand Yadav (Judicial Member)3 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

Facts

The appeals, covering assessment years 2006-2007 to 2012-2013, arose from a CIT(A) order dated 5th August 2021. Initially dismissed for non-prosecution, they were restored by the Tribunal on 4th February 2024. The assessee's subsequent adjournment request was rejected, with the Tribunal noting the CIT(A)'s order as non-speaking.

Held

The Tribunal identified two core issues: the unsubstantiated claim of agricultural income and the CIT(A)'s lack of detailed consideration regarding the set-off of business loss against short-term capital gain. Concluding that fresh adjudication was necessary, the Tribunal restored the matters to the CIT(A) for a de novo order, directing the assessee to provide all relevant material and ensuring a proper opportunity of being heard.

Key Issues

1. Whether the assessee's claim for agricultural income was properly substantiated with evidence. 2. Whether the set-off of business loss against short-term capital gain was correctly addressed by the CIT(A).

Sections Cited

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, COCHIN BENCH, COCHIN

Before: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Prakash Chand Yadav

Hearing: 31.12.2024Pronounced: 22.01.2025

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL COCHIN BENCH, COCHIN Before Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Accountant Member & Shri Prakash Chand Yadav, Judicial Member ITA No.108/Coch/2021 : Asst.Year 2006-2007 ITA No.109/Coch/2021 : Asst.Year 2007-2008 ITA No.110/Coch/2021 : Asst.Year 2008-2009 ITA No.111/Coch/2021 : Asst.Year 2009-2010 ITA No.112/Coch/2021 : Asst.Year 2010-2011 ITA No.113/Coch/2021 : Asst.Year 2011-2012 ITA No.114/Coch/2021 : Asst.Year 2012-2013 Sri.K.N.Sreekumar The Assistant Commissioner Sarovarm, Kanakary of Income-tax v. Kottayam – 686 632. Kottayam. PAN : CIOPS34597L. (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by : --- None --- Respondent by : Smt.Leenalal, Sr.AR Date of Pronouncement : 22.01.2025 Date of Hearing : 31.12.2024 O R D E R Per Bench : The present appeals of the assessee are arising from the order of the learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-3, Kochi dated 5th August, 2021 and it relates to the assessment years2006-2007 to 2012-2013. 2. Since common issues are involved in these appeals, they were heard together and are being disposed of by this consolidated order.

3.

These appeals were earlier dismissed by the ITAT for want of prosecution from the side of the assessee. However the

2 ITA Nos.108-114/Coch/2021. Sri.K.N.Sreekumar. appeals were restored by the Tribunal vide its order dated 04.02.2024.

4.

Today, when the matter was called for, an adjournment application was filed by the assessee. However, these appeals are very old and the order of the CIT(A) is a non-speaking order, so the Bench felt that the bench will decide the matter. Therefore, the adjournment application filed by the assessee stands rejected.

5.

The learned Departmental Representative could not seriously object to the suggestion of the bench for restoring the matter back to the file of the CIT(A) for deciding afresh.

6.

After perusing the material available on record, we observe that two major issues are involved in these cases, i.e., (i) issue of agricultural income, for which the CIT(A) has held that the assessee failed to file any evidence to substantiate its claim of agricultural income, and (ii) set off of the business loss with short term capital gain, on this issue the CIT(A) has not dealt in detail. Therefore, we are of the firm opinion that the matters require fresh adjudication at the end of the ld.CIT(A). Therefore, we restore these matters to the file of the CIT(A) for passing a fresh order in accordance with law after providing reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee. The assessee is also directed to place on record all the relevant material before the CIT(A) so that the issues involved can be decided in judicious manner.

3 ITA Nos.108-114/Coch/2021. Sri.K.N.Sreekumar. 7. In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes.

Order pronounced on this 22nd day of January, 2025.

Sd/- Sd/- (Inturi Rama Rao) (Prakash Chand Yadav) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Cochin; Dated : 22nd January, 2025. Devadas G* Copy to : 1. The Appellant. 2. The Respondent. 3. The CIT, Cochin. 4. The DR, ITAT, Cochin. 5. Guard File. Asst.Registrar/ITAT, Cochin

SRI.K.N.SREEKUMAR,KOTTAYAM vs THE ACIT, KOTTAYAM | BharatTax