M/S INFYCONS CREATIVE SOFTWARE PRIVATE LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CPC (TDS), GHAZIABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) should have considered the reasons for the delay in filing the appeals. Applying the principles laid down by the Supreme Court, the delay deserves to be condoned.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed appeals before the CIT(A) with significant delays, citing organizational changes and issues with the TDS consultant. The CIT(A) dismissed the appeals without considering the reasons for delay.
What were the issues?
Whether the delay in filing appeals before the CIT(A) against intimations under Section 200A should be condoned based on the reasons provided by the assessee.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(2)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Collector, Land Acquisition v. Mst. Katiji3,926 citing167 ITR 471 · 1987 · SC
- Concord of India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Smt. Nirmala Devi and Others268 citing118 ITR 507 · 1979 · SC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, BANGALORE BENCHES : “B”, BANGALORE
Before: SHRI A.K.GARODIA & SMT.BEENA PILLAI, JUDICAL MEMBER
Date of hearing : 09-12-2019 Date of pronouncement : 13-12-2019 O R D E R PER BENCH : Present appeals have been filed by assessee against order dated 26/12/18 and 25/06/19 passed by Ld. CIT (A)-3 Bangalore.
ITA Nos.324 -328(B)/2019 and -1721(B)/2019 2 2. Ld.AR submitted that these appeals arise out of intimation under section 200A of the Act, passed by Ld.AO levying interest under section 234E of the Act. 2.1 She submitted that appeal before Ld.CIT(A) for Q3 andQ4 pertaining to assessment years 2013-14, 2014-15 and Q4 pertaining to assessment year 2015-16, was filed with delay of 575,868,152,1001and 1003 days. It was submitted that delay in filing appeals was due to certain change in organization, and consultant who was in charge of TDS did not track intimations regularly. It was submitted that, for reasons beyond control there was delay to file appeals by assessee against intimation under section 200A of the IT Act, 1961 dated 1-10-2016, 13-05-2014, 31-05-2014, 30-07-2015. Further she submitted that against intimation dated 11-10-2014, though appeal was filed with delay of 868 days, Ld.CIT(A) dismissed the appeal, since appeal filed was found to be defective. 2.2 She further submitted that appeal before Ld.CIT(A), for Q1, Q2 pertaining to assessment year 2013-14 and Q3 pertaining to assessment year 2014-15, filed with a delay of 1955 days. It was submitted that intimations under section 200A were not reflecting in TRACES website and assessee was unaware regarding these intimations. It was only when assessee received a consolidated outstanding demand for payment from the Department that assessee personally went to the concerned TDS jurisdiction to collect these intimations dated 26-10-2013.
More judgments on Section 200A
- Mulchand Ramkishan Laddha, Pune vs Income Tax Officer (TDS-2), PuneITA 874/PUN/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2013-14
- Suyash Dhondu Paste, Ratnagiri vs Income Tax Officer, TDS, KolhapurITA 2669/PUN/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
- Suyash Dhondu Paste, Ratnagiri vs Income Tax Officer, TDS, KolhapurITA 2668/PUN/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
- Suyash Dhondu Paste, Ratnagiri vs Income Tax Officer, TDS, KolhapurITA 2667/PUN/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
- Suyash Dhondu Paste, Ratnagiri vs Income Tax Officer, TDS, KolhapurITA 2666/PUN/2026[2014-15]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2014-15
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Akshaya Consortium vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Dipanshu Aggarwal vs. Director General Of GST IntelligenceDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Dezinetree Projects PVT. LTD. vs. Spokes Digital Inc And AnrDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Jaydeep Jayantilal Hudaka vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 28 Oct 2026
- Commissioner/Additional Commissioner Of Central Tax vs. M/S INDIA Agro Exports Private LimitedKarnataka · 28 Oct 2026