SHALIN JAYANTBHAI DESAI,VADODARA vs. THE PR. CIT-3, VADODARA
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The assessee's authorized representative requested to withdraw the appeal as the Assessing Officer had given effect to the revision order without making any additions, rendering the appeal academic. The DR had no objection.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against a revision order passed under section 263 of the Income Tax Act for AY 2010-11. The appeal was filed with a delay, which was condoned by the tribunal due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal has become academic and can be withdrawn by the assessee.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AHMEDABAD “A” BENCH
Before: Ms. Annapurna Gupta & Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar
Shalin Jayantbhai The Pr.CIT-3, Desai Vadodara 4, Harsh Park, Vs (Respondent) Near Tagore Nagar, Old Padra Road, Vadodara-390005 PAN: ABNPD5378C (Appellant) Appellant by : Withdrawal Application Respondent by : Shri Vijay Kumar Jaiswal, CIT/DR Date of hearing : 18-10-2022 Date of pronouncement : 19-10-2022 आदेश/ORDER PER : T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER:-
This is an appeal filed by the Assessee as against the Revision order dated 21.04.2020 passed under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-3, Vadodara relating to the Assessment Year (A.Y) 2010-11.
The Registry has noted that there is a delay of 573 days in filing the above appeal. The appeal is filed on 13.01.2021. This period falls under COVID-Pandemic situation, thus following Hon’ble Supreme Court judgment dated 23.3.2020 in suo moto Writ Petition (Civil) No.3 of 2020, vide Hon’ble Supreme Court has extended time limit for filing appeals w.e.f. 15.3.2020. Thus, there is no delay in filing the above appeal and we take the appeal of the assessee for adjudication
At the outset, there is letter dated 17.10.2022 from the Authorized Representative. That pursuant to the Revision order passed under section 263, the Ld. Assessing Officer given effect to the order wherein there is no addition was made. Therefore the appeal becomes academic in nature and the assessee may be permitted to withdraw the appeal.
The Ld. D.R. has no objection for the withdrawal.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is hereby dismissed as withdrawn.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sutlej Textiles And Industries Limited vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S. Ut Corp vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026
- Sunrise Engineering vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Kalra Traders vs. Union Of INDIAUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Ms Isoft vs. The Commissioner State TaxUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026