M/S SOGO SYNERGY PVT LTD,BANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-12(2), BANGALORE

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1401/BANG/2018Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore20 December 2019AY 2007-084 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal set aside the order of the CIT(A) and remanded the issue back for fresh adjudication. The assessee was directed to pay Rs. 10,000 to the Chief Minister's Relief Fund and provide all necessary details.

What were the facts?

The assessee's appeal before the CIT(A) was dismissed for non-compliance and failure to provide requisite details. The assessee claimed their consultant's non-appearance was due to unavoidable circumstances and that written submissions were filed.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(A) was justified in dismissing the appeal without deciding on merits due to the assessee's non-appearance, and if the assessee should be granted an opportunity to be heard.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B’’ BENCH : BANGALORE

Before: SHRI A. K. GORODIA & SMT. BEENA PILLAI

Hearing: 16.12.2019Pronounced: 20.12.2019

O R D E R

PER BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER :

Present appeal filed by Assessee is against the order dated 29/01/2010 passed by Ld. CIT (A) – 6, Bangalore for assessment year 2007 – 08. 2 It has been submitted by the Ld.AR that Ld.CIT (A) has not decided the issues on merits of the case and dismissed the appeal by noting that assessee failed to filed requisite details. Ld. AR submitted that the consultant of assessee failed to appear due to unavoidable circumstances and there was no intention of non-compliance. He submitted representative filed written submission before Ld. CIT (A) on 23/02/17 against additions made by Ld. AO. He thus prayed for the issue being set aside to authorities below. 3 Ld. Sr. DR submitted that assessee failed to appear even before Ld. AO, which shows negligence on behalf of assessee and lack of interest in participating in the proceedings. He submitted that Ld. CIT (A) was therefore right in dismissing assessee’s appeal. 4 We have perused submissions advanced by both sides in the light of records placed before us. Admittedly, assessee has not appeared before Ld. AO as well as Ld. CIT (A) except for filing written submission dated 23/02/17 as has been mentioned in the order of Ld. CIT (A). There has been no specific reason for non-appearance before Ld. CIT (A) as has been brought out by Ld. AR before us. However rendering of justice cannot be denied to assessee and no decision can be passed without being heard in accordance with law. 5 We therefore set aside this issue back to Ld. CIT (A) some checked to cost of Rs. 10,000/- payable to Chief Minister’s Relief Fund. Ld. CIT (A) shall issued notice of hearing to assessee on presenting the payments being satisfactorily made in an affidavit. Needless to say that assessee shall be granted proper opportunity of being heard by Ld.CIT (A) as per law and assessee is directed to file all requisite details in support of its contentions against addition made by Ld.AO. Ld.CIT (A) shall carry out all necessary verification/remand in order to decide the issue as per law. Accordingly grounds raised by assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes. In the result appeal filed by assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open court on 20th December, 2019.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →