M/S. SUN PHARMA LABORATORIES LTD.,MUMBAI vs. THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC, BANGLORE

PDF · subscribers
ITA 298/AHD/2021Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad04 November 2022AY 2017-183 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The assessee filed an application for withdrawal of the appeals, citing the Supreme Court's decision in the Checkmate Services Pvt. Ltd. case. The revenue did not object to the withdrawal.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed appeals against the disallowance of late deposit of employees' contribution to PF/ESI. The issue involved the disallowance of late payment of employees' contribution to ESI/EPF.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was the disallowance of late deposit of employees' contribution to PF/ESI. The assessee sought to withdraw the appeal based on a Supreme Court judgment.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 36(1)(va),Section 2(24)(x)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AHMEDABAD “D” BENCH

Before: Shri P.M. Jagtap & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

For Respondent: Shri Atul Pandey, Sr. D.R

आदेश/ORDER PER : SIDDHARTHA NAUTIYAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER:-

1.

These two appeals filed by the assessee are against the order of National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi in DIN & Order No. ITBA/NFAC/S/2021-22/1035496460(1) vide order dated 13/09/2021 passed for the assessment year 2017-18 & 2018-19.

& 342/Ahd/2021 A.Y. 2017-18 & 2018-19 Page No. 2 Ms. Sun Pharma Laboratories Ltd. vs. Dy. CIT

2.

With reference to the captioned appeals, the issue involved is of disallowance of late deposit of employees’ contribution to PF/ESI. In the captioned appeals, the CIT(A)-2, Vadodara had dismissed the appeals filed by the assessee on account of delayed payment of employees’ contribution to ESI/EPF u/s. 36(1)(va) read with section 2(24)(x) of the Act.

3.

The assessee filed appeals against the order of CIT(A)-2 Vadodara which are listed before us. The assessee filed application for “withdrawal of appeal” dated 14th October, 2022, in respect of both the appeals, since the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in the case of Checkmate Services Pvt. Ltd. (Civil Appeal No. 2833 of 2016) Vs. CIT (1) has decided the issue against the assessee. The ld. Departmental Representative has also not objected to assessee’s request for withdrawal of the captioned appeals. Accordingly, the assessee’s appeals are dismissed as withdrawn.

4.

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed as withdrawn.

More judgments on Section 36(1)(va)

All 6,054 judgments and leading authorities on Section 36(1)(va) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →