SAMI BHARATKUMAR,CHENNAI vs. ITO, NCW - 16 (2), CHENNAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal, considering principles of natural justice, decided to grant the assessee one more opportunity to substantiate their claim before the Assessing Officer. The appeal was restored to the Assessing Officer for readjudication.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A) for AY 2015-16. The assessee was non-cooperative before the assessing officer, CIT(A), and the tribunal, with no representation at the hearing.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the assessee's failure to provide evidence to substantiate investments and their non-cooperation throughout the assessment and appeal process.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Before: Shri George Mathan
O R D E R
PER GEORGE MATHAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) 4, Chennai in 19/AY:2015-16/CIT(A)-4 dated 26.06.2019 for the assessment year 2015- 16. None represented on behalf of the assessee and Ms. R. Anita, JCIT represented on behalf of the Revenue.
It was submitted by the ld. DR that the assessee has been non- cooperative before the assessing authority as also before the ld. CIT(A) and even before the Tribunal. Though an appeal has been filed, there was no representation. It was the submission that the assessee having got no evidence to produce, the appeal of the assessee is liable to be dismissed.
I have considered the submissions of the ld. DR. A perusal of the assessment order shows that though show-cause notice has been issued to the assessee, the assessee has not produced any evidence before the Assessing Officer to substantiate his investments. A perusal of the order of the ld. CIT(A) shows that the assessee has been negligent there also. Even before the Tribunal, though the appeal has been posted for hearing on multiple dates, there was no representation. However, considering the principles of natural justices, I am of the view that the assessee must be granted one more opportunity to substantiate his claim before the Assessing Officer. In the circumstances, the issues in this appeal is restored to the file of the Assessing Officer for readjudication after granting the assessee adequate opportunity of being heard.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open Court on 20th August, 2020 at Chennai.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sutlej Textiles And Industries Limited vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S. Ut Corp vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026
- Sunrise Engineering vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Kalra Traders vs. Union Of INDIAUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Ms Isoft vs. The Commissioner State TaxUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026