M/S. ATLANTIC REALTOR PRIVATE LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that interest under sections 234A and 234B should be computed after reducing the amount of tax paid by the assessee prior to the filing of the return. The direction issued by the CIT(A) to re-compute the interest was upheld.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed its return of income belatedly and had paid a significant sum as self-assessment tax before filing the return. The Assessing Officer computed interest under sections 234A and 234B on the entire tax amount without considering this pre-filing tax payment.
What were the issues?
Whether interest under sections 234A and 234B should be computed on the entire tax amount or after deducting the tax paid before filing the return.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Dr. Prannoy Roy v. Commissioner of Income-tax61 citing121 Taxmann 314 · 2002 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCHES: ‘A’, NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI N.S. SAINI & SMT. BEENA A PILLAI
ORDER PER BEENA A PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER Present appeal has been filed by assessee against order dated 13/07/14 passed by LdCIT(A)-5, New Delhi for Assessment Year 2011-12 on following grounds of appeal: “1. The CIT(A) erred in law and on facts in not deleting the excess interest of Rs.7,63,608/- charged u/s 234A and Rs.2,09,339/- u/s 234B in assessment order for A.Y. 2011-12 despite the fact that the appellant has deposited a sum of Rs.1,29,98,110/- on 31/03/2012 Atlantic Realtor Private Ltd. Vs. DCIT i.e. before filing of return. Thus, order of the Ld.CIT(A) passed merely on surmises and conjectures should be reversed.
2. The appellant craves leave to add, substitute, modify, delete or amend all or any ground of appeal either before or at time of hearing.”
2. Brief facts of case are as under. Assessee for year under consideration filed its return of income belatedly on 04/10/12 by declaring income of Rs. 3,28,40,260/-. A sum of Rs. 1,29,98,110/-was paid on 31/03/12 under section 140 A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) i.e. 6 months before date of filing of writ.
3. Case was picked up for scrutiny under section 143(2) on 12/08/13 and assessed at income amounting to Rs.3,28,40,260/- on 18/02/14. Ld. AO computed interest of Rs. 14,18,131/-under section 234A and Rs. 15,82,445/-under section 234B on entire tax amount up to date of filing of return i.e. 04/10/12.
4. Aggrieved by order of Ld.AO assessee preferred appeal before Ld.CIT (A) wherein he raised a plea that Ld. AO did not give credit of taxes and interest amounting to Rs.1,29,98,110/- paid by assessee on 31/03/12. After going through law applicable to present facts of case Ld.CIT(A) directed Ld. AO to re-compute interest in accordance with provisions of section 234A and 234B.
5. Aggrieved by order of Ld. CIT (A) assessee is in appeal before us now.
6. Ld.AR submitted that Ld. AO has not computed interest under section 234A and 234B to present facts of case. He Atlantic Realtor Private Ltd. Vs. DCIT submitted that Ld.AO failed to give credit to taxes paid by assessee on 31/03/12 i.e. prior to date of filing of return.
7. Ld.Sr.DR placed reliance upon order passed by Ld.CIT(A) wherein a direction has already been given to Ld.AO for re- computing interest in accordance with provisions of section 234A and 234B of the Act.
We have perused submissions advanced by both sides in light of records placed before us.
The issue relates to levy of interest under section 234A & B of the Act. The due date of filing return of income for year under consideration was 31/07/11. Ld.AO computed interest under section 234Ã for late filing of return. Ld.AR placed reliance upon decision of Hon’rable Delhi High Court in case of Dr Prannoy Roy vs CIT reported in 121 taxman 314 wherein Hon’ble Court held that interest under section 234A is payable in a case where tax has not been deposited prior to due date of filing of return. In present case assessee failed to deposit self-assessment tax before due date of filing of return. However, it is observed that assessee paid self- assessment tax under section 140A on 31/03/12 and return was filed on 4/10/ 2012. Thus in our considered opinion as per provisions of the Act, interest under section 234A & B has to be computed after reducing amount of tax paid by assessee in the form of advance tax or tax deducted or collected at source etc. 9.1. We are, therefore, of considered opinion that interest under section 234 A & B shall be computed after reducing a sum of Rs.1,29,98,110/- paid by assessee on 31/03/12.
Atlantic Realtor Private Ltd. Vs. DCIT 9.2. On perusal of order passed by Ld.CIT(A) a similar direction has been issued by Ld.CIT(A) to re-compute interest in accordance with provisions of section 234 A and 234 B. We do not find any infirmity in such direction issued by Ld.CIT(A). We uphold the same with a specific direction to Ld.AO to compute interest after reducing amount of tax paid by assessee on 31/03/12.
Accordingly the appeal filed by assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in open court on …./06/2019.
More judgments on Section 234A
- Vikas Ashokkumar Masand, Ahmedabad vs The Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 3130/AHD/2026[A.Y. 2017-18]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026
- Sarvjeet Singh Through Legal Heir Manjit… vs ITO Ward 1(1), AlwarITA 355/JPR/2025[2013-14]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- Parthasaradhi Mutually Aided Co-Operative… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-17(1), HyderabadITA 2322/HYD/2026[AY 2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 2128/MUM/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 4558/MUM/2023[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Mehra Mac Industries Private Limited vs. The Deputy State Tax OfficerTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- Santosh Das And Anr. vs. Union Of INDIACalcutta · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S Rama Krishna Industries vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 30 Oct 2026
- Smt Usha W/O Shri Tarun vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maruti Nandan Minetech Private Limited vs. The Joint CommissionerRajasthan · 29 Oct 2026