No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCHES “C”, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI RAJESH KUMAR (AM) & SHRI RAM LAL NEGI (JM)
O R D E R
PER RAM LAL NEGI, JM
This appeal has been filed by the revenue against the order dated 06.12.2018 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1 (for short ‘the CIT(A), Thane, for the assessment year 2009-10, whereby the Ld. CIT(A) has allowed the appeal filed by the assessee against the penalty order passed u/s 271 (1) (c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short the ‘Act’).
Aggrieved by the order of Ld. CIT (Appeals), the revenue has preferred this appeal before the Tribunal on the following effective grounds:- 1. “Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT (A) was justified in deleting the penalty levied u/s 271 (1) (c) without property appreciating the decisions of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Mak Data Pvt. Ltd. Vs CIT (Civil Appeal No. 9772 of 2013)”, the Hon’ble Gujarat High Court’s decision in the case of N.K. Proteins Ltd., Tax Appeal No. 242 of 2003 dated 20/06/2016 against which the SLP Assessment Year: 2009-10 was dismissed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court and also ignoring the fact that Department received specific credible information in this case from the Sales Tax Department of the State Government of Maharashtra” in respect of non-genuine purchases.
2. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT (A) was justified in deleting the penalty levied u/s 271 (1) (c) without appreciating the fact that there was a definite finding in the assessment order in respect of bogus purchases and of furnishing inaccurate particulars of income relating to purchases resulting into concealment of income.
It is humbly requested that present appeal is being filed in accordance with the CBDT’s Instruction No. 3/2018 dated 11/07/2018 amended vide letter dated 20.08.2018 as per para 10(e) of the said circular. Therefore, the order of the CIT (A) may kindly be vacated and that of the AO may be restored.”