M/S MEGHNA DISTRIBUTORS PVT. LTD.,RAIPUR vs. I.T.O.,WARD-10(2), KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal restored the assessee's grievances back to the CIT(A) for a fresh adjudication. This was done because the CIT(A)'s order was passed ex parte and the assessee's claim of non-service of notice was not controverted.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal for AY 2009-10 was against the CIT(A)'s ex parte order. The assessee claimed the CIT(A)'s hearing notice was not served, a fact not rebutted by the revenue.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) order passed ex parte without proper service of notice to the assessee is valid. The issue of addition made under Section 68 and enhancement of income.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA BENCH “Virtual C” KOLKATA
Before: Shri J.Sudhakar Reddy & Shri S.S.Godara
None अपीलाथ� क� ओर से/By Appellant Shri Supriya Paul, Addl. CIT-DR ��यथ� क� ओर से/By Respondent 19-11-2020 सुनवाई क� तार�ख/Date of Hearing 25-11-2020 घोषणा क� तार�ख/Date of Pronouncement आदेश /O R D E R PER S.S.Godara, Judicial Member:- This assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2009-10 arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-4, Kolkata’s order dated 30.08.2019 passed in case No.52/CIT(A)-4/2019-20 involving proceedings 147 r.w.s. 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961; in short ‘the Act’. Case called twice. None appears at the assessee’s behest. It has filed its written submission(s) dated 19.11.2020. The same is taken up on record. It is accordingly proceed ex parte.
We notice at the outset with the able assistance of the learned Addl. CIT-DR that the CIT(A)’s lower appellate order affirming the Assessing Officer’s action
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- The State Of Bihar Through The Commissioner Of State Tax vs. Kaushlendra KumarPatna · 27 Oct 2026
- Ayush Sureshchandra Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026